Gr «T 3

Annals of the Missouri Botanical

Garden 2007

olume 94

umber

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Volume 94, Number 1 April 2007

The Annals, published quarterly, contains papers, primarily in systematic botany, contributed from the Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. Papers originating outside the Garden will also be accepted. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed by qualified, independent reviewers. Authors should write the Managing Editor for information concerning arrangements for publishing in the Annals. Instructions to Authors are printed in the back of the last issue of each volume and are also available online at

www.mbgpress.org.

Editorial Committee

Victoria C. Hollowell Scientific Editor,

Missouri Botanical Garden Beth Parada

Managing Editor,

Missouri Botanical Garden Diana Gunter

Associate Editor,

Missouri Botanical Garden Barbara Mack

Editorial Assistant, Missouri Botanical Garden Monica Anderson

MBG Press Assistant,

Missouri Botanical Garden

Ihsan A. Al-Shehbaz Missouri Botanical Garden Gerrit Davidse

Missouri Botanical Garden Roy E. Gereau

Missouri Botanical Garden Peter Goldblatt

Missouri Botanical Garden Gordon McPherson Missouri Botanical Garden P. Mick Richardson Missouri Botanical Garden Charlotte Taylor

Missouri Botanical Garden Henk van der Werff

Missouri Botanical Garden

For subscription information contact ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN, % Allen Mar- keting & Management, P.O. Box 1897, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897. Subscription price for 2007 is $165 per volume U.S., $175 Canada & Mexico, $200 all other countries. Four issues per volume. The journal Novon is included in the subscription price of the Annals.

annals@mobot.org (editorial queries) http://www.mbgpress.org

The Annais or THE Missouri BOTANICAL GARDEN (ISSN 0026-6493) is published quarterly by the Missouri Botanical Garden, 2345 Tower Grove Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110. Periodicals post- age paid at St. Louis, MO and additional mail- ing offices. Postmaster: Send address changes to ANNALS OF THE Missouri BOTANICAL GARDEN, Yo Allen Marketing & Management, P.O. Box 1897, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897.

The Annals are abstracted and/or indexed in AGRICOLA (through 1994), APT Online, BIOSISO, CAB Ab- stract/Global Health databases, ingenta, ISI databases, JSTOR, Research Alert®, and Sci Search®.

Typesetting by Allen Press, Inc. using Advent3B2 automatic paging system.

O Missouri Botanical Garden Press 2007

'The mission of the Missouri Botanical Garden is to discover and share knowledge about plants and their environment, in order to preserve and enrich life. © This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).

Volume 94 Annals Number 1 of the 2 () ¥issourt BOTANICAL Missouri MAY 1 1 2007 Botanical GARDEN LIBRARY Garden

A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF Mary E. Endress, Raymond W. J. M. van der ALYXIEAE (APOCYNAC EAE) : a b 1 10 BASED ON RBCL, MATK, TRNL peur onn Powell David bo idi INTRON, TRNL-F SPACER Ylva-Maria Zimmerman," and Victor A. Albert“ SEQUENCES, AND

MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS!

ABSTRACT

Within Rauvolfioideae (Apocynaceae). genera have long been assigned to tribes based mainly on only one or two superficial fruit and seed characters. Taxa with drupaceous fruits were included in Alyxieae. To elucidate relationships within Alyxieae, we analyzed phylogenetically a data set of sequences from four plastid DNA regions (rbcL, M, tral. intron, and trnL-F intergenic d and a morphological data set for 33 genera of Apocynaceae, inc luding. representatives of all genera previously included in Alyxieae and two non-Apocynaceae species. Results of parsimony analysis indicate that Alyxieae as previously delimited are polyphyletic, with most genera falling into two main clades. The Alyxia clade includes seven genera:

lyxta Banks ex R. Br., Lepinta Decne., Lepintopsis Valeton, Pteralyxia K. Schum., and CONI; Desf. together with Plectaneta Thouars. (earlier included in Plumerieae) and Chilocarpus Blume (earlier included in Chilocarpeae). The Vinca clade includes eight genera: Cabucala Pichon, Petchia Livera, Rauvolfia L. ia G. Don. Vinca L., Neisosperma Raf.,

Ochrosia Juss.. and Kopsia Blume. Vallesia Ruiz & Pav. and Anechites Griseb. are not related to either clade and come out as sister to Aspidosperma Mart. & Zucc. (Aspidospermeae) and Thevetia L. (Plumerieae), respectively. The fruit and seed

! We wish to thank the following persons who provided pleni material or DNA samples: A. Assi, Paul Berry, F. Billiet, pia Bremer, V. Ferreira, P. Garnock-Jones, P. Kessler. I. Koch. A. Leeuwe eia rg, S. Liede, ^ Ne ill.] R. Omlor, I q lignat,

„S. Tucker, and S. Zona. For technics da ssistance and photographie help with s pollen

>

révost, G. Ro mero, A. Spech contribution sincere thanks are die to Elisabeth Grafström and AS Hellbom, Palynological Laboratory, Swedish Museum

of Natural History. Stockholm, and Bertie Joan van Heuven and Wim Star, Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Leiden. This study was supported by a grant from the Helge Ax:son Johnson d and the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation Research (STE `) to B. Sennblad.

? Institute of Systematic Botany, University of Zürich, Zollikerstrasse 107, 8008 Zürich, Switzerland. mendress@systbot. unizh.ch.

zh. '*Naltionaal Herbarium Nederland, P.O. Box 9514, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. ‘Laboratoire, Dynamique de la Biodiversité, UMR 5172, Université Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, Cedex 9, France. ^ Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond Surrey, TW9 3DS, United Kingdom.

Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, AlbaNova Research C enter, 8E-10691 Stockholm, Sweden. College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 60801. U.S.A. " National Tope ba Pone al Garde n, 3530 Papalina Road, Kalaheo Kauai, Hawaii 96741, U.S.A. "Institut fiir vie und Morphologie. Universität Witten/Herdecke, la Str. 10 D-58448. Witten. Germa

e Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Box 1172 Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway T Siwert Nilsson passed away unexpectedly before the manuscript was completed. We los! boil an excellent collaborator

and a dear friend. We dedicate this paper to him.

ANN. Missourt Bor. GARD. 94: 1-35. PUBLISHED ON 26 APRIL 2007.

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

characters previously used to demarcate Alyxieae are homoplasious, as are other morphological characters such as style head

structure and syncarpy versus apocarpy. Conversely, pollen morphology. which has not previously played much of a role in

tribal delimitation, was shown to be the most useful morphological character for delimiting Alyxieae from other tribes of

Rauvolfioideae. Key words:

Alyxieae, Apocynaceae, classification, matk, morphology, phylogeny, pollen, rbcL, systematics, tral. trnb-F.

Tribal

referred to as Plumerioideae in the older literature)

delimitation in Rauvolfioideae (usually

has previously been based on fruit and seed characters (Schumann, 1895; Pichon, 1949a, 1949c; Ly, 1986; Leeuwenberg, 1994a). One reason that fruit and seed characters have been so frequently used in classifications and keys is that they are readily observed, permitting easy recognilion of many genera. The j

classifications is that the flowers of many Rauvolfioi-

other main reason for the fruit-based tribal

deae tend to be superficially similar. Many are

relatively small with a whitish, salverform corolla,

and there are few obvious distinguishing floral characters useful for differentiating tribes in this subfamily. The most detailed studies of Rauvolfioi- deae were those of Pichon (1948a, 1948b, 1949a, 1950b), who published extensively on the family. His classificalion was a greal improvement over ils predecessors. lts main weakness was that tribal delimitation was based mainly on a single fruit character. He split the rauvolfioid tribes into two main groups, depending on whether the deeper layers of the mesocarp were fleshy or dry. The group with a fleshy inner mesocarp was divided into five tribes: Carisseae, Ambelanieae, and Macoubeeae comprised those taxa with indehiscent berries and Chilocarpeae and Tabernaemontaneae included those taxa with fruit consisting of dehiscent follicles with arillate seeds. In the group with a dry mesocarp, he recognized three tribes. Two of them are characterized by dehiscent fruits: Alstonieae (Plumerieae sensu Leeuwenberg, 1994a), in which the fruit consists of a pair of follicles. and the monotypic Allamandeae, in which the fruit is a spiny unilocular capsule. The last tribe, Rauvolfieae (Alyxieae sensu Leeuwenberg, 1994a), contained all taxa in which the fruit is an indehiscent drupe with a stony endocarp. It is the relationships within this group that are the focus of this paper.

Pichon (1949a) recognized five subtribes within his Rauvolfieae: Rauvolfinae (including Cabucala Pi- chon, Petchia Livera, Rauvolfia L., and Podochrosta Baill.), Alyxiinae (including Alyxia Banks ex R. Br.. Lepinia Deene., and Lepiniopsis Valeton), Ochrosiinae (including only Ochrosia Juss.), Vallesiinae (including Ruiz & Blume

Condylocarpinae (including Rhipidia Marker. and

Vallesia . and

Pav. and KO

Cond ylocarpon Desf.).

Pichon. included two genera

as incertae sedis: Anechites Griseb. and Notonerium

Benth. Notonerium has since been shown to belong to Boraginaceae (Crisp, 1983).

In his classification from 19% a, Leeuwenberg maintained Pichon’s (104% a) circumscription of Rau- volfieae as well as the five subtribes included there but gave no insight into the delimitation of. the subtribes, stating only that the relatively slight its subtribes are not easily

differences between

described in a concise way. The only differences between Leeuwenberg's (1994a) and Pichon’s (19494) tribal eireumscriptions are that Leeuwenberg changed the name of the tribe to Alyxieae, put Podochrosta into

synonymy under Rauvolfía and Rhipidia in Condylo-

carpon (following Fallen, 1983b), and included Anechites in Condylocarpinae, although Fallen

(1983a) had suggested earlier that a position closer to taxa previously included in Cerbereae (Cameraria L.. Cerbera L., Cerberiopsis Vieill. ex Pancher & Sebert, Thevetia L.. and Skytanthus Meyen) was more appropriate. More recently, Leeuwenberg (1997) pul Cabucala into synonymy under Petchia.

In addition to the taxa mentioned above, there are four other genera characterized by drupaceous fruits: Cerbera, Thevetia, Cerberiopsis, and Cameraria. These, together with Skytanthus, with follicular fruits, were split out of Rauvolfioideae and treated by Pichon (1948b) as a separate subfamily, Cerberoideae. The characters he used for delimitation of this subfamily are ambiguous. Leeuwenberg (1994a) recognized the

group as defined by Pichon, but at the tribal level as

Cerbereae. Morphological studies by Fallen (1985 suggested a close relationship between Cerbereae and Allamanda l., the sole genus placed in Allamandeae by Pichon (1949a) and Leeuwenberg (1994a). Studies based on molecular or combined morphological and molecular data (Endress et al., 1996; Sennblad & Bremer, 1996, 2000, 2002) indicated that the genera previously included in Cerbereae do form a natural group (see Potgieter & Albert, 2001, for a different opinion) and that they are only a part of a larger group that includes not only Allamanda, but also Plumeria L. (usually included in the Plumerieae: Rauvolfioi- deae). An analysis of Cerbereae is not the aim of this study, although some representatives from that tribe are included in our analyses.

Using fruit characters to delimit tribes in Rauvol- fioideae is appealing because it allows taxa to be

easily categorized and keys to be constructed.

Volume 94, Number 1 2007

Endress et al. 3 Phylogenetic Analysis of Alyxieae

other characters of these do not

indicate the same patterns of relationships. Phyloge-

However, taxa netic analyses of mainly molecular data have shown that these fruit- and seed-based classifications are considerably

more artificial than previously sus-

pected. An rbcL analysis by Sennblad and Bremer (1996) indicated that Catharanthus G. Don (with dry

dehiscent follicles and included in Plumerieae

Was more closely related to taxa previously placed i

~

al Alyxieae sensu Leeuwenberg (1994a) than to other Plumerieae. In larger studies (Sennblad. ; Sennblad & Bremer, 2000, 2002). Catharanthus and Vinca L. formed a well-supported clade together with Rauvolfia, Ochrosia, and Kopsia, which have fleshy

e S

í

drupes. In the same study, Chilocarpus Blume, which has always been thought to be most closely related to Carisseae, formed a strongly supported clade with Alyxia and Lepinia (Alyxieae), confirming results of a strongly supported Chilocarpus—Alyxieae clade reported previously by Civeyrel (1996) and van der Ham et al. (2001). Pichon (1949a) already realized that Geissospermum Allemao (with indehiscent fruits and seeds embedded in pulp) is probably the nearest relative of Aspidosperma Mart. Zucc. (with dry dehiscent follicles and wind-dispersed seeds with a diaphanous wing), a position supported by Potgieter Albert (2001) and Simões et al. (2007). In and Albert (2001) found that Vallesia (with drupaceous fruits and seeds embedded in juicy pulp) is closely related to Haplophyton A. DC.

(with dry dehiscent follicles and wind-dispersed Such that fruit characters in Apocynaceae are evolutionarily plastic

and

addition, Potgieter

comose seeds). results indicate in response to selective pressures for adaptations associated with wind or animal dispersal.

The most recent classifications of Apocynaceae s.l. (Endress & Bruyns, 2000; Sennblad & Bremer, 2002) attempted. to rectify some of these anomalies. In the classification of Endress and Bruyns (2000), Anechites was moved to a newly defined Plumerieae (including Cerbereae sensu Leeuwenberg (1994a) as well as Allamanda), a position suggested by Fallen (19832), and Vallesia was included with Aspidosperma, Geis- sospermum, and Haplophyton in a newly defined Alstonieae. The remainder of Alyxieae (sensu Leeu- wenberg, 1994a) was split into two tribes, Alyxieae and Vinceae, based on molecular results as well as additional. morphological characters. Alyxieae sensu

Endress and Bruyns

2000) included seven genera: Alyxia, Pteralyxia K. Schum., Lepinia, Lepiniopsis, Plectaneia Thouars, Condylocarpon, and Chilocarpus.

inceae Walter, Catharanthus, Vinca, Rauvolfia, Petchia, Kopsia, Neisosperma Raf., and Ochrosia. Rhazya Decne. was considered to be

synonymous with Amsonia, and Cabucala with Petchia

included Amsonia

(following Leeuwenberg, 1997). Simões et al. (2007)

treated Amsonia incertae sedis and

transferred Laxoplumeria Markgr.,

as a genus Tonduzia Pittier, and Kamettia Kostel. to Vinceae, bringing the total number of genera in the tribe up to 10.

The classification of Sennblad and Bremer (2002) proposed a new system that is compatible with traditional Linnaean nomenclature but uses a variant of the definitions used in phylogenetic nomenclature Although

they do not provide lists of included genera, their

Y classifications.

AO

to improve the stability

definitions of the tribes containing traditional Alyx- ieae genera are completely congruent with those of Endress and Bruyns (2000). The aim of this study is to cladistically evaluate and Vinceae as circumscribed by Endress and Bruyns (2000) in comparison

the

Alyxieae

with previous classifications, to re-

examine usefulness of fruit and seed characters for tribal delimitation within Rauvolfioideae, and to discover new morphological characters that have hitherto received little attention in classification of

this subfamily but show phylogenetic potential.

MATERIALS AND METHODS TAXON SAMPLING

The ingroup taxa were chosen to include represen- tatives of all genera of Alyxieae (sensu Leeuwenberg, 1994a), as well as other putatively related genera. The oulgroup taxa are one genus each of Loganiaceae and Gelsemiaceae, which several studies (Bremer & Struwe, 1992; Chase et al., 2000; Soltis et al., 2000) have demonstrated to be closely related to Apocynaceae (Appendices 1, 2). Other more ron focused studies on Gentianales (Struwe et al., 1996; Backlund et

al., 2000) ra uu indicated that Loganiaceae and

1993; Savolainen et al.,

Endress et al.,

Gelsemiaceae are the closest families to Apocyna- ceae. For the morphological analyses, we omitted the outgroups altogether because, in preliminary analyses, one or the other of these genera was embedded

different portions. of the ingroup due to obvious parallelisms of certain characters; we arranged the morphological tree with the same group sister to the

rest as in the molecular results.

FLORAL STRUCTURE

Fixed flowers at or near anthesis (only buds were avallable for Lepintopsis) were dehydrated in an alcohol-xylene series, embedded in paraplast, cut with a rotary microtome at 10 um, and stained with safranin and astra blue. For SEM studies, material was critical-point dried and then sputter-coated with

gold.

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

POLLEN MORPHOLOGY

Pollen material was sampled from the 1 BISH, BR, COL, G, L, P, PTBG, QCA,

UB, WAG, and Z. Pollen studies were carried out in

herbaria: Leiden and Stockholm. For light microscopy (LM), pollen material was acetolyzed (except for Condylo- carpon and Vinca), mounted in glycerine jelly, and 10 pollen grains were

sealed with paraffin. Generally,

measured for polar axis (P) and equatorial diameter

(E). For SEM, pollen was sputter-coated with gold and examined with a JSM 5300 or JSM 6300 scanning

electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo). Frozen sections

were made using an Ames Tissue-TEK Cryostat. For

transmission electron microscopy (TEM), unaceto-

lyzed material (whole anthers) was embedded in Spurr

resin or 3/7 Epon, sectioned with a LKB Ultrotome II or V, poststained with uranylacetate and lead citrate, and examined with a Zeiss 10, a JEOL 100-5, or a JEM 1010. Terminology is according to Punt et al. (1994).

OTHER MORPHOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERS

Information on fruit and seeds were taken from observations of herbarium specimens as available. Several fruit and seed characters were taken from the literature, as were data on the presence of laticifers and intraxylary phloem (Solereder, 1892; Schumann, 1895; Valeton, 1895; Degener, 1946; Pichon, 1947a, 1947b, 1948a, 1948b, 1948c, 1948d, 1949a, 19400. 1949¢, 1950a, 1950b, 1950c, 1952; Gensel, 1969; Markgraf, 1971, 1976, 1979; Markgraf & Huber, 1975; Corner, 1976; 1980; Leeuwenberg & 1980; Rogers, 1986; Rudjiman, 1986; 1987; Metcalf & Chalk, 1989; Rosatti, 1989; Wagner et al., 1990; Sévenet et al., 1994; Forster & Williams, 1996; Omino, 1996; Leeuwenberg, 1997; Sidiyasa, 1998; Lin & Bernardello, 1999). Chemical data were taken from the literature (Johns et al., 1968; 1970, 1989; Coppen & Cobb, 1983; Kisakürek et al., 1983; Homberger & Hesse, 1984;

1987; Endress et al., 1990; Wagner et al., ; Zhu et al., 1990; Attaurrahman et al., 1989, Arambewela & Ranatunge, 1991; Jensen, 1992; 1994; Zeches et al., 1995; Kam et al.,

Conn, Leenhouts,

Pagen,

Hegnauer,

1991: Sévenet et al..

1997).

MOLECULAR METHODS

16 of matK, and 11 of

intron and trnl-F intergenic

Nine new sequences of rbcL, the n

produced for this study;

spacer were the other sequences were published previously (Appendix 2). Total DNA was extracted from fresh leaves, silica gel-dried material (Chase & Hills, 1991), or herbarium material using the methods of Saghai-Maroof et al. (1984) or modified

Doyle and Doyle (1987). For the latter. DNA samples

were purified by ultracentrifugat

in CsCl-ethidium bromide gradients (1.55 m Additional 1 (Qiagen,

cases with

using the QlAquick PCR purification Valencia, California) was performed in problematic polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ampli- Double- stranded DNA was amplified with PCR primers for rbcL from Fay et al. (1998); the trnL intron and trn L-F

fication using the manufacturer's. protocol.

intergenic spacer (hereafter, trnL-F) were amplified using the c and f primers of Taberlet et al. (1991): matk primers were those of Endress et al. (1996) and Johnson and Soltis (1994). Direct sequencing of PCR products was performed using the PCR primers plus internal sequencing primers. For rbcL, the internal primers were those of Fay et al. (1998); for trnL-F, we Taberlet et al. (1991); and for matK, we designed two new internal primers: 734F, | 5'-ATGTATGTGACTACGAATCA-3' 829R, 5'-ACTTTCTATTTTTCCATAGA-3'

ber of cases, we also used the internal sequencing

used the d and e primers of

and

In a num-

primers as PCR primers to amplify shorter products.

For sequencing, we used either the Dye Deoxy Terminator Cycle Sequencing or Big Dye kits of Applied Biosystems (ABI; Warrington, Cheshire,

United Kingdom). Sequencing reactions were carried out directly on the cleaned PCR products and run on an ABI 277a automated sequencer at Kew following the manufacturer's protocols.

CLADISTIC ANALYSES

The data matrix comprised four submatrices: each

the three

^ ©

DNA regions plus morphology. The morphological submatrix (Appendix 3) comprises 54 characters from floral, fruit, vegetative, and pollen morphology and phytochemistry (Appendix 4). All

PAUP* 4.0b10

(Swofford, 2002). Heuristic searches were performed

analyses were performed using with all characters given unit weight (Fitch parsimony; Fitch, 1971), separately before their joint combined analysis. Each

1000

random taxon entry, the subtree pruning

and each submatrix Was analyzed

of the searches used the following settings: replicates of re-grafting (SPR) branch swapping algorithm, and MULTREES on (saving multiple equally parsimonious

All the

shortest trees were then collected and used as starting

trees) but holding only 10 trees per replicate. trees for a search with a 25,000-tree limit. If the tree limit was reached, then swapping was allowed to continue until all 25,000 trees were swapped to completion.

BP) (Felsenstein, 1985)

were calculated with 500 replicates on each of the

Bootstrap percentages

submatrices as well as on the two combined matrices

Volume 94, Number 1 2007

Endress et al. 5 Phylogenetic Analysis of Alyxieae

(molecular combined and molecular/morphological We

branch swapping

used the following settings: SPR and MULTREES on, holding only All other settings were those of the PAUP* 4.0. This

produces results statistically indistinguishable from

combined).

10 trees per step. standard defaults of strategy other, more thorough bootstrap protocols (Salamin et al., 2003). We apply the following arbitrary scale in our discussion: 5096—7496, weakly supported; 7596— 84%, 85% - 100%, strongly supported. Alignment for rbcL and matK was a simple the had only a few easily characterized. insertions/ deletions (indels). irnL-F, alignment of Potgieter and Albert (2001) and added

moderately supported;

matter: former had no length variation, and the

atter For we started with the

the additional taxa needed for this analysis, which required adding a few more insertions; we did adjust their alignment in places following Kelchner (2000). We analyzed the trnL intron and trnL-F. intergenic spacer in a single analysis (which can be considered

“non-coding” because there is only about a 30 bp

region of the trnL exon included); this region, termed Irnl-F, number of variable sites is the lowest and, even when

is composed of two unrelated parts, but the combined, these produced a highly unresolved strict consensus tree. We do report statistics for these two regions separately (Appendix 2) but consider results only for the two combined.

Incongruence of different regions of plastid DNA

me

would be unexpected because recombination is

unknown in the generally uniparentally inherited plastid genome. Several tests for combinability have been developed, but we have not used any of them in this paper. Such tests have proven to be unreliable indicators of incongruence (Reeves et al., 2001), so we altach no particular significance to results of these tests but instead prefer to look for cases of strongly supported and incongruent patterns of relationships. Differences in relationships are to be expected with different matrix components simply due to sampling effects where there are too few variable characters to obtain clear patterns. If, however, there are only a few characters in a matrix, such as is the case here with the morphological characters, differentiating between sampling error and incongruent patterns is extremely difficult. estimates of relationships deviate from those based on DNA data, particularly for the Vinceae, but the small

We note that the morphologically based

number of morphological characters (only 54) does not permit us to say whether the differences between

molecular and morphological patterns are evidence of

true incongruence. Character state distributions. of selected morpho- logical characters were individually mapped onto the

total evidence tree (Figs. 10, 11) using MacClade 4.0

(Maddison & Maddison, 2000) to illustrate character evolution and compare the usefulness of characters that have previously been used in delimitation of

Alyxieae.

RESULTS MORPHOLOGY

Analysis of the morphological matrix produced 31 trees in three islands (18, 4, and 9 trees) of equally parsimonious trees, each of 246 steps with a consis- teney index (CI) of 0.37 and a retention index (RI) of 0.62. A strict (Fig. 1; numbers below the branches are BPs) shows that these morphological data, and the three islands place

consensus tree of all three islands

he position of several genera is unclear with

them in different relative positions to the clades that The glabra

are consistently resolved in all three islands. positions of Vallesia antillana Woodson, V.

Cav.) Link,

cathartica L., Anechites nerium (Aubl.) Urb.,

and the Plumeria clade (Allamanda

Plumeria rubra L., and Thevetia peruviana (Pers.) K. Schum.)

consistent in all three islands, as is a clade

are composed of all remaining taxa. Within the last, Acokanthera oblongifolia (Hochst.) Codd, A. oppositi-

folia (Lam.) Codd, er laxum (Benth.) Pichon, Durand & H. Pleiocarpa mutica iu Tabernaemontana divar- icata (L.) R. Br. & Schult., and T. pandacaqui Lam. occupy different positions in each the consistently resolved clades: (1) L.) R. Br. to Rhazya stricta Decne. and (2) Alyxia oblongata Domin and A. ruscifolia R. Br. to Nerium (Fig. 1). The other conspicuously differ- ently placed group is that composed of Amsonia ciliata Walter, and Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don + Vinca major L. and V. minor L., which in two of the islands (18 and 9

Picralima nitida (Stapf) Durand,

ex Roem.

three islands with respect to

^ ©

Alstonia scholaris

oleander L.

A. tabernaemontana Walter, Rhazya stricta,

tree islands) are a clade but in the other island form a grade. Clades that receive moderate to strong BPs are

the following: Neisosperma nakatana (Koidz.)

Fosberg & Sachet + Ochrosia coccinea (Teijsm. &

Binn.) Miq. (BP 83), Alyxia oblongata and A. ruscifolia + Lepinia marquisensis Lorence & W. L. Wagner, L. solomonensis Hemsl. and L. taitensis Decne. + Lepiniopsis ternatensis Valeton and L. trilocularis Markgr. + Pteralyxia kauaiensis Caum

and P. macrocarpa (Hillebr.) K. Schum. (BP 97; the last two genera with BP 96; Kibatalia gitingensis (Elmer) Woodson + Mascaren- . + Nerium oleander (BP 98;

2tcralima. nitida. +

the Alyxia clade), hasia arborescens the first two genera adi BP 94), Pleiocarpa mutica (BP 84), and Allamanda cathartica

6 Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

r- Acokanthera oblongifolia

L- Acokanthera oppositifolia Alstonia scholaris

7 Amsonia ciliata | Amsonia tabernaemontana —— Cabucala polysperma

Kopsia fruticosa Neisosperma nakaiana T ——— Petchia ceylanica Rauvolfia vomitoria Catharanthus roseus Vinca minor fe Vinca major Craspidospermum verticillatum Rhazya Stricta Alyxia oblongata L Alyxia ruscifolia Lepinia marquisensis f 97 Lepinia solomonensis

Lepinia taitensis 96 Lepiniopsis ternatensis 70 95 Lepiniopsis trilocularis Pteralyxia kauaiensis Pteralyxia macrocarpa 58 r- Condylocarpon guyanense L- Condylocarpon isthmicum r- Chilocarpus denudatus I Chilocarpus suaveolens r- Plectaneia stenophylla E Plectaneia thouarsii Kibatalia gitingensis 94 Mascarenhasia arborescens Nerium oleander Molongum laxum r—- Picralima nitida 84 1— Pleiocarpa mutica r— Tabernaemontana divaricata L— Tabernaemontana pandacaqui Allamanda cathartica oa Anechites nerium Bt Thevetia peruviana Plumeria rubra Vallesia antillana L— Vallesia glabra Aspidosperma parvifolium

98

Figure 1. Strict consensus tree of the three islands found in the morphological analysis. Numbers below the branches indicate bootstrap percentages greater than 50%.

Volume 94, Number 1 2007

Endress et al. 7 Phylogenetic Analysis of Alyxieae

+ Anechites nertum Catharanthus roseus + Vinca major and V.

(BP 72).

nearly reached the moderate level

ANALYSIS OF RBCL

Of the 1398 included positions, 244. (18%) were variable and 146 (10%) were potentially parsimony informative. Analysis produced two islands of equally parsimonious trees, one of 39 trees and the other of 16 they had 479 steps with CI (including un- informative positions) of 0.59 and RI of 0.63. The two

islands differ in the relative positions of Neisosperma

ume]

lrees:

oppositifolia (Lam.) Fosberg & Sachet and Rauvolfia mannii Stapf and Chilocarpus suaveolens Blume +

Condylocarpon guyanense Desf. In island one, the

atter form a clade with the Kibatalia gitingensis + Mascarenhasia arborescens + Nerium oleander clade, and Neisosperma oppositifolia and Rauvolfia mannii unresolved members of the

are including

Cabucala polysperma (Scott-Elliott) Pichon + Petchia

clade

ceylanica (Wight) Livera + Ochrosia coccinea. In

island two, oppositifolia + Rauvolfia

mannii are sister to Catharanthus roseus + Vinca

minor, and 1 1 suaveolens + Condylocarpon

guyanense are unresolved. The strict consensus of

oth islands (Fig. 2) therefore shows these taxa to be unresolved. Supported clades that are also found

the morphological analysis include the following: Allamanda cathartica + Plumeria inodora Jacq. (BP 100) and Anechites nerium + Thevetia peruviana (BP BP 025

ruscifolia + Lepinia taitensis + Lepiniopsis trilocularis

whole Plumeria clade, Alyxia

+ Pteralyxia kauaiensis (the Alyxia clade; BP 99

Picralima nitida sister to Pleiocarpa mutica (BP 100): Catharanthus roseus + Vinca minor (BP 68): and Kibatalia gitingensis + Mascarenhasia arborescens + BP 93). Well- supported clades that are not strongly in conflict with the

Nerium oleander (the Nerium clade;

morphological results include: Aspidosperma

triternatum Rojas Acosta as sister to Vallesia antillana (BP 100); Plectaneia stenophylla Jum. as sister to the Alyxia clade (BP 98), within which the topology is the same as in the morphological results; Amsonia tabernaemontana as sister to Rhaz zya stricta (BP 100); Cabucala polysperma as sister to Petchia ceylanica (BP 100); and Molongum laxum as sister to Tabernaemontana divaricata (B 5). Chilocarpus suaveolens as sister to Condylocarpon guyanense (BP 85) is contradicted in the morphological results by a weak BP 70 for the latter to be sister to Alyxia clade. Weakly supported results not contradicting relation- ships produced by morphology are the Plumeria clade (BP 62: Allamanda cathartica,

Plumeria inodora, and Thevetia peruviana); Picralima

Anechites nerium,

Thevetia peruviana (BP 84).

minor

nitida + Pleiocarpa mutica as sister to the Alyxia clade, plus Plectaneia stenophylla (BP 70); and the Vinca clade (BP 65; Cabucala polysperma, Petchia ceylanica, Ochrosia coccinea, Catharanthus roseus, Vinca minor, Neisosperma oppositifolia, and Rauvolfia

mannii).

ANALYSIS OF MATK

The aligned matK matrix contained 1647 bp, of which 561 (349) were variable and 250 (15%) were potentially parsimony informative. We were unable to mat k: Lepinia, Lepiniopsis, Ochrosia, and Plectaneta.

Anechites, Anal- ysis produced a single, most parsimonious tree of 970 steps with a CI of 0.73 and an RI of 0.59. Patterns of

relationships are nearly identical to those found with

amplify the following taxa for

rbcL, but in general, BPs are higher than with rbcL or irnL-F (Fig. 3). Patterns that were not observed with rbcL include: Chilocarpus suaveolens + Condylocarpon guyanense (BP 100) as sister (BP 99) to the Alyxia clade (BP. 100);

in an isolated position as sister (BP 93) to all but

Alstonia scholaris strongly supported

Aspidosperma triternatum + Vallesia antillana; and Aspidosperma triternatum + Vallesia antillana (BP 82) moderately supported as sister to the the ingroup (BP 97).

rest of

ANALYSIS OF TRNL-F

The aligned trnL-F matrix consisted of 1206 bp (761 bp from the trn L intron and 445 bp from the trnL- F spacer). We were unable to amplify the following irnL-F: Kibatalia G. Don and Lepinia. Analysis produced over 25,000 trees of 460 steps with a CI of 0.78 and an RI of 0.70 (trnL i steps with a CI of 0.76 and an RI of 0.69; trnL-F intergenic spacer: 168 steps with a CI of 0.82 and an RI of

largely

taxa for

0.72) (Fig. 4). Relationships from these two.

non-coding regions are similar to those

estimated from rbcL and matK (Figs. 2, 3). The major noteworthy result (also observed in the matK results,

but which received BP < 50) is a strongly supported

clade (BP 97) composed of Nerium oleander and Mascarenhasia arborescens of the Nerium clade, observed with morphology. Thel, and matK, with

Acokanthera oppositifolia weakly supported as sister (BP 60) also observed but without support with matK. and Allamanda indet. + Plumeria alba Kunth (BP 95), ) A. DC. (the

last two unresolved with respect to the Nerium clade)

Anechites nerium, and Thevetia ahouai (L.

COMBINED MOLECULAR ANALYSES

The combined data set produced 46 equally

parsimonious trees of 1925 steps with a CL of 0.70

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

[—— Geniostoma

UL Gelsemium Acokanthera Allamanda 100 Plumeria 62 Ly Anechites 97 Thevetia | Alstonia Aspidosperma 100 pr IBN Vallesia Alyxia Lepinia 99 93 Lepiniopsis 98 79 Pteralyxia Plectanela e r—— Picralima 100 - ——— Pleiocarpa r—— Amsonia DOS 100 - ——— Rhazya Cabucala 100 Petchia 53 Ochrosia

r—— Catharanthus

68 ——— Vinca Neisosperma Rauvolfia

r—— Chilocarpus 85 |. ——— Condylocarpon Craspidospermum

Kibatalia e Mascarenhasia 93 OL. Nerium Kopsia

r—— Molongum 95 L——— Tabernaemontana

Strict consensus tree of the two islands found with the rbel, data. Numbers below the branches indicate

65

Figure 2. bootstrap percentages greater than 50%.

Volume 94, Number 1 2007

Endress et al. 9 Phylogenetic Analysis of Alyxieae

Geniostoma Gelsemium Acokanthera Kibatalia Mascarenhasia Nerium 14 [22 Allamanda 100.17. Plumeria 58 40 Thevetia 4 26 —— Amsonia B 98 US Rhazya a P Craspidospermum à 142 2 Picralima 25/90 100L2_ Pleiocarpa

35 LL Alyxia Pteralyxia

Chilocarpus Condylocarpon Cabucala Petchia Catharanthus Rauvolfia Vinca Neisosperma

Kopsia

Molongum

Tabernaemontana Alstonia

29

19. Aspidosperma

82

Figure 3.

Vallesia

‘he single most parsimonious tree found with the matK data. Numbers above the branches indicate estimated

substitutions, ACCTRAN optimization. Numbers below the branches indicate bootstrap percentages greater than 50%.

and an RI of 0.62. One of the shortest individual trees is shown in Figure 5, with estimated substitutions (ACCTRAN

branches and BPs below: groups not present in al

optimization) indicated above the

m

shortest trees are marked with an arrowhead. We show a single tree to illustrate. relative levels of genetic divergence. The contribution of each region to this tree was: rbcL, 488 steps (vs. 479 for the rbcL trees); matK, 974 steps (vs. 970 for the matK tree); trnL

intron, 293 steps (vs. 292 on the trnL-F trees); and

irnL-F intergenic spacer, 170 steps (vs. 168 on the irnL-F trees). Patterns of relationships are much like those in the previous analyses, and BPs are generally

higher than in any of the individual analyses.

ANALYSIS OF ALL DATA COMBINED

The combined data produced a single, most

parsimonious tree of 2226 steps with a CI of 0.65 and an RI of 0.60 (Fig. 6). The DNA optimized onto

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Geniostoma

95

| | L- Gelsemium

60 | 100

Acokanthera Mascarenhasia Nerium Allamanda Plumeria Anechites

Thevetia

Alyxia Lepiniopsis Pteralyxia

Plectaneia p Chilocarpus

Condylocarpon Amsonia

E

L__ Rhazya Cabucala Petchia Catharanthus Neisosperma

Ochrosia

56

Rauvolfia

Vinca

~ 5 L

Craspidospermum Kopsia

Molongum Tabernaemontana

Picralima

91

... 1L ——. Pleiocarpa

Alstonia

Aspidosperma

99

Fig 4.

the bra ane che ss indicate bootstrap percentages greater than 5

this tree is 1926 steps, combined DNA tree: Kopsia fruticosa (Ker.

one step longer than the this step is caused by shifting Gawl.) A. DC.

laxum + Tabernaemontana (two spp.,

and Molongum Appendix 2) from an unresolved position with respect to the major clades into positions as a grade with respect to the Vinca clade. Otherwise, relationships are exactly as The data optimized onto the combined trees (ACCTRAN a CI of 0.33 and an RI of 0.55, versus 266 steps with a CI of 0.38 and an

with the combined molecular data. morphological

16 steps with

optimization) was 2

RI of 0.61 in the morphological analysis.

LL Vallesia

Strict consensus tree of the 25,000 equally pus t pe wsimonious trees found with the trnb- data. Numbers below 5066

DISCUSSION

EVALUATION OF TRADITIONAL CIRCUMSCRIPTIONS OF ALYNIEAE

Both the morphological and the molecular analysis indicate that Alyxieae as previously eireumscribed are polyphyletic. Of the individual data sets analyzed, the tree best

based on matK provided the support,

followed by that of trnL-F. BPs in the tree based on

rbcl 4

much of the tree a polytomy,

and the morphological data set were low, with and the positions of

several genera were equivocal. Even then, however,

Endress et al. 11

Volume 94, Number 1 Phylogenetic Analysis of Alyxieae

84 Geniostoma

L83 Gelsemium outgroups 1 Acokanthera Carisseae 19 Kibatalia 28 j l Mascarenhasia Apocynoideae 13 Nerium 45 Allamanda Plumerieae Vinceae Alyxieae 61/100 70 p 19% 39 ra Chilocarpus 100 L65. Condylocarpon 5 " pss Craspidospermum _ Melodineae Y 57 Picralima united m Pleiocarpa E ullis 7 7 Is Vinceae > ¿ES SF} 39 24 Molongum 15 100 " Tabernaemontana | Tabernaemontaneae 98 Cabucala da rosia 21 Eas l 97 27 Vinca Vinceae 99 Rauvolfia Neisosperma 37 nia DT 49 f Aspidosperma Alstonieae 100 L4Z Vallesia =

Figure 5. One of the most parsimonious trees found with the combined molecular data. Numbers above the branches indicate estimated substitutions, ACCTRAN optimization. Numbers below the branches indicate bootstrap percentages greater

than 50%. Groups not present in all 46 shortest trees are noted with an arrowhead.

clusters of genera are present. The combined data tree is similar to that produced by the combined molecular data and provides much better support for patterns of relationship already seen in each of the individual trees. Therefore, the remainder of the discussion will be based on the total combined tree (Fig. 6). This tree is not intended to represent relationships within or among tribes other than Alyxieae and Vinceae.

All genera traditionally included in Alyxieae are preceded by a dot in Figure 6. Vallesia and Anechites,

both included in Alyxieae by Pichon (1949a, 1950b,

as Rauvolfieae) and maintained there by Leeuwenberg

1994), are not closely affiliated with any of the other

Vallesia is sister to Aspidosperma, a that previous phylogenetic studies (Sennblad & Bremer, 2000, 2002; Potgieter & Albert, 2001; 2007). It is unlikely that a close relationship between Vallesia and Aspidosperma would have been predicted

based on their floral or fruit structures; they are too

members of the ingroup.

position supports results of

Simoes et al.,

siomorphic to be of much help, and the small

indehiscent drupaceous fruits of the former look very

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

E Geniostoma L89. Gelsemium outgroups 47 Acokanthera Carisseae 32 Kibatalia o] 0 28 Mascarenhasia Apocynoideae Plumerieae 58 Amsonia ; 100 Er Rhazya B 10 Alyxia Lepinia Lepiniop Pteralyxia Alyxieae 68/100 10 Plectaneia (The Alyxia clade) A 42 22. Chilocarpus 100 m non mii Craspidospermum Melodineae 13 Laso” Picralima 100L9.. Pleiocarpa . |Funterieae 16 2 bucala EJ Petchia Rauvolfia 75 ooo Vinceae 26 E ^ ico (The Vinca clade) 94 1158 Ochrosia opsia ogee _ |Tabernaemontaneae 100 Tabernaemontana | 3 Alstonia 54 39 F Alstonieae 100 46 Valles

Figure 6. data.

indicate bootstre ap percentages great

Numbers above the branches indic er iini 50% dier

. The Al

and brackets. « Alyxieae (Rauvolfieae in es

te estimated substitutions, ACCT yxta clade and the Vinca clade are classific: ations). A =

The single most ane caine tree found in the total combined analysis of the morphological and molecular

the branches

indicated with thicker branches

AN optimization. Numbers below

taxa not recognized at generic rank by Leeuwenberg

(19944). Tribal n. names on right follow the classification of Endress and Bruyns (2000).

different from the dehiscent follicular latter. A close relationship between the two genera is . In. both genera the pollen has five or six apertures (as opposed the

however, supported by pollen morphology which are The

Endress

Lo usual 3-aperturate condition),

surrounded by distinctive prominent. ridges.

inclusion of Vallesia in Alstonieae sensu and Bruyns (2000) is supported by previous rbcL data (Sennblad Bremer, 2000, 2002), but not by trnL-F

data (Potgieter & Albert, 2001). which included more

fruits of the

genera near the base of Apocynaceae. In our analysis, Anechites is sister to Thevetia, grouping with members of Cerbereae of traditional classifications (Cerberoi- deae of Pichon, 1948b). which confirms results based on morphology (Fallen, 1983a; Alvarado-Cárdenas & 2007) 2000,

Bruyns’ (2000) inclusion of Anechites in Plumerieae.

Ochoterena, and earlier rbcL data (Sennblad &

Bremer, 2002) and supports Endress and

The remainder of the genera of Alyxieae fall into two

main clades.

Volume 94, Number 1 2007

Endress et al. 13 Phylogenetic Analysis of Alyxieae

RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN VINCEAE AND ALYXIEAE

The first main cluster of Alyxieae in the combined

analysis (Fig. 6) is the Alyxia clade and includes Alyxia, Lepinia, Lepiniopsis, and Condylocarpon. In

addition, the placement of Chilocarpus, Plectaneia,

and Pteralyxia in this clade is well supported. This

corroborates the positions of Alyxia, Lepinia, and

Chilocarpus in the study by Sennblad and Bremer

(2000, 2002) based on rbcL data. Except for Condylocarpon, the members of this group have

irregular pollen grains with relatively large porate The Lepinia and Lepiniopsis have three or four apertures 2001). Within the Alyxia clade,

Alyxia, Lepinia, Lepiniopsis, Pteralyxia, and Plecta-

apertures. aperture number is usually two:

(van der Ham et al., The first three. genera

(19492)

Alyxiinae. Pteralyxia was considered to be

neia form a clade (Fig. 6).

correspond to Pichon’s and Leeuwenberg’s

(1994a

a synonym of Alyxia by Pichon (1949a) and a synonym

of either Ochrosia by Leeuwenberg (see

2001: 169,

has previously been

Alyxia or Gunn et al.. 1992 and van der Ham et al., 187).

included in

Plectaneia, in contrast,

Plumerieae and has usually been considered to be related to genera such as Gonioma E. Mey., Stephanostegia Baill., and Craspidospermum

Bojer ex A. DC. 1895;

Plectaneiinae of Pichon, 1949a: Craspidosperminae of

(Alstoniinae of Schumann, Leeuwenberg, 1994a), all of which are included

Melodineae in Endress and Bruyns (2000). In terms of Alyxia, Lepinia, Lepiniopsis, and tight-knit

(Fig. 7). The porate apertures can be large (maximum

pollen morphology,

Pteralyxia form a monophyletic group

less

SEA

21-33 Um), their margins are clearly thickened clearly also in Chilocarpus), the inner exine surface is

granular (also in subfamily Apocynoideae), the inner

PEN

exine layer (nexine) is completely endexinous, the

infratectum is hardly recognizable (being reduced to + sparse gaps in the inner ectexine), and a relatively thick tectum is present (also in several other taxa).

Lepinia and Lepiniopsis share the presence of an

rt

ornamentation consisting of anastomosed verrucae

(van der Ham et al., 2001). In the large analysis of trnL-F by Potgieter and Albert (2001), Alyxia, Lepiniopsis, Condylocarpon, and Plectaneia were

whereas Pteralyxia affined unlikely

Pteralyxia considering its distinctive pollen,

supported in Alyxieae, with Plumerieae. This is an position. for which is a synapomorphy of Alyxieae and found nowhere else

2001). As the

same vouchered specimen was used as the source of

1 Apocynaceae (van der Ham et al.,

DNA for both studies, the reason for this discrepancy between our trn L-F results and those of Potgieter and Albert (2001) is most likely due to a mix-up in the

aboratory. It is noteworthy that of the seven genera in

the Alyxieae, four, Lepinia, Lepiniopsis, Pteralyxia, and Plectaneia, are island endemics (Leeuwenberg, 1997; Lorence & Wagner, 1997), and Alyxia has its ereatest species diversity in the Pacific (Middleton, 2000, 2002).

Chilocarpus and Condylocarpon are sister genera

that are the sister group to the remainder of Alyxieae

Fig. 6). Because of its syncarpous ovary, Chilocarpus was included in Carisseae (Willughbeieae sensu Endress Bruyns, 2000) by Schumann (1895,

Arduineae) and the invalid Chilocarpinae by Pichon (1948a). Leeuwenberg (1994a) provided a Latin di-

agnosis, raised Pichon's subtribe to tribal level, and in

his recent revision of Chilocarpus (Leeuwenberg,

2002) considers Chilocarpeae to fall somewhere between Carisseae and Ambelanieae. New World

exhibits a set of deviating pollen features (tetrads,

Condylocarpon is the only member of Alyxieae and inaperturate, and reduced exine; Fig. 7) that strongly indicate the pollen to be paedomorphic (i.e... un- derdeveloped regarding pollen wall features, vet viable). The basically decussate tetrad configuration indicates Condylocarpon pollen to be derived from a 2- aperturate rather than from a 3-aperturate ancestor, providing additional support for its present position in Alyxieae (van der Ham et al., 2001). Despite its aberrant, inaperturate, nearly exineless pollen, Con- dylocarpon resembles Chilocarpus in a number of other morphological aspects, especially the distinctive globose head of the flower buds. The fruits exhibit some superficial similarities; in most species of both genera, they are moniliform and woody, although the gynoecium is syncarpous and dehiscent in Chilocar- pus and apocarpous and indehiscent in Condylocarpon

(Fallen, 1983b

The second cluster of

main Alyxieae in the combined analysis (Fig. 6) is the Vinca clade and includes Cabucala, Petchia, Rauvolfia, Ochrosia,

Vinca. All

taxa in this clade are characterized by a differentiated

Neisosperma, Kopsia, Catharanthus, and style head with a distinct annulus at the base, but this is a plesiomorphic feature and is also found in other

Alstonia R. Br.,

Plumerieae). Similarly,

tribes (e.g., Alstonieae; Allamanda, the pollen morphology of this clade is unspecialized (Fig. 8). The occurrence of well-developed colpal and mesocolpial plates due to the presence of distinct supplementary endocolpi

(absent in Vinca, weak Kopsia and several taxa outside the Vinceae: Acokanthera G. Don, Allamanda, Aspidosperma, and Plumeria) is their most discrimi- nating feature. Of the

Rauvolfia,

Schumann’s (1895) classification. He included Rau-

taxa in the Vinca clade,

Ochrosia, and Kopsia were treated in

volfia in Rauvolfinae, together with nine other genera,

none of which shows a close relationship with

14 Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Figure 7. Apocynaceae, Alyxieae. SEM and TEM images of pollen grains. A-C. Alyxia ruscifolia. A. Barrel-shaped 2- orate sula n grain d aed unknown) with differently sized pores. —B. Detail of A, showing psilate, perforate ornamentation. —C. TEM section of exine and intine, showing lectum (above), infratectum (gaps), and endexinous inner layer with dark ine fever be dark granules on the inner surface (arrow). D, E. Pleralyxia kauaiensis. —D. Barrel-shaped 2-porate pollen grain (orientation 1 with differently sized pores. —E. Detail of undulate ornamentation with perforations in the depressions. —F. Pleralyxia macrocarpa. TEM section d exine and intine, showing thick tectum (above). infratectum e line and several small gaps), and ende inous inner layer with small dark inclusions and larger dark surface granules (arrow). G, H. Lepinia solomonensis. —G. Tetraporate pollen grain (orientation unknown) with unequal sides and differently sized pores. —H. Detail of verrucate ornamentation. —1. Lepinia taitensis. TEM section of exine and intine. showing thick tectum (above), infratectum (commissural line and gap). and endexinous inner layer with small dark inclusions

D ge B Pa Z * 2 Q m n S 2

T nsis. —]. ¿ 3-porale polle n grain (orie nlalion unknown) with unequal sides and differently sized pores. —K. Detail of J, showing + verrucate ornamentation. psilate annulus, and inner surface granules (arrow) inside pore. —L. TEM section P exine and intine, showing thick tectum (above ). infratectum (commissural line and sparse gaps), and endexinous inner laver with small dark inclusions anc i: large dark surface granules (arrow). M. O. Chilocarpus denudatus. —M. Psilate to finely fossulate s pollen grain (orientation unknown).

-

0. TEM section of exine and intine, showing tectum (above), granular infratectum, and ectexinous inner verrucate la iver. N Plectaneia thouarsii. —N. Psilate, perforate 2-porate polle n grain (orientation a —R. TE Mo section of exine and

Volume 94, Number 1 2007

Endress et al. 15 Phylogenetic Analysis of Alyxieae

Rauvolfía im this study or other recent analyses (Sennblad & Bremer, 2000, 2002; Potgieter & Albert, 2001; 2007), Kopsia were included in a different subtribe, Cerber- Endress & 2000). circumscribed by (1949a)

The Rauvolfinae comprised

Simoes et al., whereas Ochrosia and

eae (Plumerieae of Bruyns,

Rauvolfieae as Pichon included four subtribes. Cabucala, Petchia, and Rauvolfia, which are sup- ported as monophyletic in the Vinca clade. Ochrosi- nae contained only Ochrosia (including Neisosperma), and Vallesinae included Vallesia and Kopsia, which His

Alyxinae and Condylocarpinae, belong to

are only distantly related here. other two subtribes, elements of Alyxia clade in our study. Pichon (1949a) included Anechites as a genus incertae sedis, noting that he did not have sufficient material to place it, but he thought that it most probably belonged with Condylocarpon or in a tribe of its own.

The classification of Leeuwenberg (1994a) followed Pichon’s, with the same tribal circumscription of Alyxieae and the same subtribal circumscriptions. The only differences were that Anechites was included as a member of Condylocarpinae and the name of the

More

Leeuwenberg (1997) placed Cabucala in synonymy

tribe was changed to Alyxieae. recently,

under Petchia. Although there are some differences in pollen morphology (differing colpus length, tectum

thickness and ornamentation, and the presence/ absence of deviating mesocolpium centers) in the species studied, the floral structure of the two genera is nearly identical, and our results do not contradict the synonymy of Cabucala. Neisosperma, which was placed into synonymy under Ochrosia by Pichon (1949a) there by Leeuwenberg (1994a) and Hendrian (2004), is often considered to

be a distinct genus, especially by specialists dealing

and maintained

with species of the Pacific Basin, where both genera

have their greatest species density (Fosberg et al.,

1977; Markgraf, 1979; Boiteau, 1981; Smith, 1988; Wagner et al., 1990; Forster Williams, 1996).

Macromorphologically, plants of Neisosperma and Ochrosia have a clear resemblance (e.g., trees with corolla lobe aestivation dextrorsely Their

fers in several aspects (size,

whorled leaves,

contort, fruits large, fleshy colorful drupes).

pollen, however, di

ectoaperture shape and margin, endoaperture margin,

and ornamentation). In our analyses, inclusion of Neisosperma in Ochrosia is only moderately supported. A detailed study including more species of both genera is needed in order to elucidate their relation- ship.

Also in the Vinca clade (Fig. 6) are two genera included in Plumerieae: Catharanthus 1895 as

Leeuwenberg,

conventionally and Vinea (Schumann, Alstoniinae; Pichon,

1949a as 1994). The

pollen of Vinca is peculiar and unique by its indistinct

Alstonieae; ectoapertures, relatively large endoapertures, and thin exine, which makes it difficult to compare with the pollen of other taxa. Vinca also shows some derived floral characteristies, such as the enlarged spathulate, apical anther appendage, which most likely plays in inhibiting desiccation of the secondarily 1908), possibly related to

the temperate habitat of this genus.

a role

presented pollen (Church,

The genera included here in the Vinca clade are the same as those included in Vinceae of Endress and Bruyns (2000), with the exception of Amsonia and Rhazya. These

considered to be closely related to Catharanthus and

two genera have traditionally been and thus conventionally included in Plumer- 1895 as

Catharanthus,

Vinca,

ieae (Schumann, Alstoniinae). Amsonia,

Rhazya,

nerinae of Pichon (1949a) and Catharanthaninae of

and Vinca constituted Loch-

Leeuwenberg (1994a). Flowers, fruits, seeds, and pollen of Rhazya scarcely differ from those of Amsonia (Pichon, 1949a; Nilsson, 1986), which was therefore treated as a synonym of Amsonia by Endress and

Bruyns (2000) and not contradicted by our study

(Fig. 6). However, Amsonia and Rhazya together group here with neither Alyxieae nor Vinceae.

Instead, they are placed as sister to the Plumerieae and Carisseae + Apocynoideae, although bootstrap support for this is less than 50% (Fig. 6). In the study by Potgieter and Albert (2001). Amsonia was in a clade together with Thevetia peruviana, which was included in a large polytomy. Floral structure of Amsonia and Rhazya, including details of the style head, is similar to that of Catharanthus and Vinca and does not agree with the more derived position for the former two genera indicated by the molecular analysis. Similarly, Amsonia and Rhazya occupy an unexpected position tree considering their secondary

in the molecular

intine, ee tectum (above), undulate granular infratectum, loose?). P, Q, S. Condylocarpon isthmicum. —P. Tetr:

members in decussate configuration. —Q. TE

constituent members, loc T tion through exte rnal wall, showing the thin tectu = 10 um in A, D, G, J

eclexinous inner layer. Scale bar

ad almost filling anther locule,

'ally fused joa walls with sparse pores (arrow

and ectexinous inner layer with surface verrucae (partly showing the four constituent, psilate

`M section through tetrad almost filling anther locule, showing three of the four

). and thin, locally thickened, external walls. —S.

m, the sp defined infratectum (arrow). a locally ES kene x M

> Q; scale bar = 1 um in B, C. K. L,

16 Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

r” zu Lon v

Figure 8. bec d in Vinceae (AP). Melodineae (Q—5). SEM and TEM images of pollen grains. —A. Petchia ceylanica. Psik:

AE colporate polle n grain in oblique view: colpi short with relative ly l: arge ¢ ae B, C. Cabucala caudata. —B. Inside of dta polle n grain showing Iwo colpal plates, « sach ene losing ane ndopore surrounded by a distinel

endoannulus: in the center a mesocolpial plate delimited from the colpal plates by supplementary endocolpi (arrows). —C. TEM section through supplementary endocolpus (arrow). colpal plate (left); and mesocolpial plate (right). —D. Kopsta Jruticosa, SEM section, showing psilate to scabrate exine stratified into two equally thick strata (tectum above) separated by a thin infratectum. —E. Ochrosia coccinea. Verrucate 3-colporate pollen grain in polar view. F-H. Neisosperma nakaiana. F. Psilate/finely rere tricolporate pollen grain in polar view. —G. TEM section through mesocolpial exine and intine, showing tectum (above), irregular infratectum and foot layer, and spongy endexine (arrow). —H. TEM section through apertural exine, showing tectum (above), regula ar ane ctum, foot layer, which is much thie ke ned under the colpus (arrow), and spongy endexine. I-K. Rhazya stricta, . Psilate, perforate pollen grain in equatorial view; colpi short and wide with relatively large e ron: —J. Inside of pollen grain showing lalongate e i ed delimited polewards D horizontally oriented colpal 2d o the left and to the right, psilate Ve cuis plates delimited by wide verrucate zon s (supple mentary

endocolpi). —K. TEM section through exine and intine, showing tectum (above), slightly thinner, zat ilate infratectum, and inner layer of the same x no ss as tectum. I. M. Vinca minor. (eritical- pou dric —L. Psilate 4-

aperturate pollen grain in polar view. silate d-aperturate pollen grain in equatorial view, HCM the indistinel ecloaperture (porous area) in center of depresse oblong zone that is 1 by 185 endoapertur: np costae. N-P. Vinca major. -N. TEM section through thin me 1 exine and intine, showing tectum (above) with indistinct perforations. distinct

Volume 94, Number 1 2007

Endress et al. 17 Phylogenetic Analysis of Alyxieae

chemistry. Both genera contain numerous complex indole alkaloids of the plumerane type (Ganzinger & 1976: Kisakürek et al., 1983), whereas in all

genera above them in the uppermost clades of the tree

Hesse,

and in Alyxieae, indole alkaloids have been lost. In

the comparative study by Nilsson (1986), however. pollen of Amsonia and Rhazya was found to be nearly identical but showed no close relationships with Cabucala (Vinceae).

pollen of Catharanthus or

Because the focus of our study was Alyxieae. this was the only group densely sampled. To better assess the phylogenetic position of Amsonia and Rhazya. additional representatives of other tribes, especially previously unstudied genera of Melodineae sensu

Endress and Bruyns (2000)

The unexpected positioning of Amsonia and Rhazya

should be included.

in the combined molecular tree (Fig. 5) away from the case of the

Amsonta and Rhazya did not

rest of Vinceae could be regarded as a

incongruence with morphology. However, in morphological analysis, always appear together with Catharanthus + Vinca, and their position was relatively unclear (e.g., no BP > 50). the DNA and

morphological better

resolution and higher support in the all-data combined

Furthermore, combining

data resulted in generally tree relative to the combined DNA data tree, which would not be expected if there were highly in- congruent basic patterns in each of them. The exact position of Amsonia/Rhazya is also not clear with the DNA data, except that their exclusion from the clade with the rest of Vinceae is not strongly supported (Figs. 5, 6), which concurs with the results of Simões et al. (2007).

SIGNIFICANCE OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERS

been demonstrated here and elsewhere

1983a; 2000, 2002;

Potgieter & Albert, 2001), superficial resemblance of

has

(Fallen, Sennblad & Bremer,

characters such as fruits and seeds of Apocynaceae that are correlated with dispersal mode are extremely labile, and there is a tendency for the repeated independent evolution of certain fruit and seed types. Similar findings for other angiosperm families have and Eriksson (1992),

been reported by Bremer

Armbruster (1996), Endress (1996), Hufford (1997). and Clausing et al. (2000). Fruit and seed characters are thus particularly unreliable when used alone for determining relationships among genera in Apocyna- fruit

dehiscence, mesocarp consistency, and seed appen-

ceae. Examples of these characters include: dages. It was the use of such simple, single character- that led to the artificial tribal classifications of Schumann (1895), Pichon (1949a).

The most reliable char-

based categories

and Leeuwenberg (1994a).

acters are likely to be more subtle, and one must be

lama]

willing to invest some effort to determine what they

are. It is also unrealistic to believe that any single character is going to provide a non-homoplasious synapomorphy for any large genus or tribe, but rather it is more reasonable to expect that these groups can be circumscribed by a specific combination of characters.

Alyxieae pollen is characterized by large porate apertures (Fig. 7), which are distinct from the usual small aperturate porate grains found in Apocynoideae. completely different from the colporate grains found in Vinceae, and characteristic for all other Rauvol- fioideae (Figs. 8, 9). Details of the pollen ectoaper- tures proved to be the most important morphological characters for defining Alyxieae because the unusual and distinct pollen type is synapomorphic for the tribe. Aperture type is less informative in the other tribes of Rauvolfioideae because, with a few excep- 8). all Rauvolfioi-

deae have colporate pollen grains. Within Alyxieae,

tions (e.g., Craspidospermum; Fig.

aberrant, inaperturate, nearly exineless pollen that remains in tetrads is an autapomorphy for Condylo- carpon. Inaperturate pollen is otherwise known in the family only in Secamonoideae and Asclepiadoideae as well as some genera of Periplocoideae that have pollinia (e.g., Finlaysonia Wall., Hemidesmus R. Br.: Schill & Jäkel, 1978; Verhoeven & Venter, 2001). Condylocarpon is also of interest biogeographically, being the only Neotropical member of Alyxieae: all other genera are found in southeastern Asia and the Pacific. Aperture type thus provides a clear distinc- tion between the Alyxieae and Vinceae.

Other morphological characteristics that distin-

guish Alyxieae from Vinceae (but not necessarily

«—

infratectum, and inner laver consisting of f oot layer and spongy endexine (arrow). P.

costa (arrow) in ectoapertural area. EM s continuous tecti

ains, showing small ectopores and h

ction through endoapertural costa outside

eavily costate DE e (arrow). —S. TEM

O. TEM section through endoapertural

'cloapertural area, showing

im (arrow), discontinuous inner exine, and Shae mae intine. Q—5. Cae verticillatum. —Q. Rhomboidal tetrad, showing several pores (in adjacent positions) near

ures. —R. TEM section through two adjacent pores of section through two adjacent

vollen grains, aa ae exine stratigraphy with joint tecta, separate infratecta, and inner exine layers; E 3 E rn I F, L, M, Q: s

(arrow). Scale bar = 10 um in A, E, F, L, scale bar

= 5 um in

1 I-K; scale bar = 1 um in B-D,

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Figure 9. Apocynaceae. Aspidospermeae (A, B, D- | Alstonieae (C), Hunterieae (G-I ). Plumerieae (J). Carisseae (K, L) Malouetieae (Apocynoideae) (M-O). SEM and TEM images of 1 n grains. A, B. arma ahaha tum. —A, Psilate/ fossulate 6-colporate pollen grain in slightly oblique polar view, showing prominent arcus-like ri surrounding the colpi.

B. SEM section of ridge, showing a thin, psilate, pe ie tectum, thick granular infratectum, M thin i inner exine layer. —C. Alstonia scholaris. TEM section through exine and inline, showing die silate, n ie tectum, granular infratectum, dimerous foot layer, and indistinct spongy e mdexine (arrow). a. allesia yn —D. Psilate pentacolporate polle n grain in polar view, showing prominent ridges surrounding colpi. —E. Part of fractured pollen grain showing three “empty? ridges and psilate to scabrate inside with elongated, unevenly distributed granular marks (arrow). —F. va llesia antillana. VEM section ua. lectum subtended by granular infratectum (arrow) and cavity, and a + dimerous inner layer. G, H

Scabrate inside of ai pollen

through ridge, . Picralima nitida. TEM section

Pleiocarpa mutica grain showing two apertures through exine and intine; exine consists subtended by a thin foot layer and thin indis Acokanthera . jys of endocracks (supplementary endocolpi:

tion dh supplementary e 'olpus. (arrow) subtended by thicke —M. Psilate triporate pollen grain, showing

. Psilate, perforate tricolporate pollen grain in polar view. eft); endo} vores have pol: ar costae (arrow). undulate d tectum, slightly thinner granular-reticulate infratectum

J. An finely perforate tric olporate

(right and extreme of relatively ‘ick. tinct endexine (arrow). —J. Anechites nerium. Psilate, "reris of tric olporate polle n grain showing colpal pl ates with arrows) delimiting psilate ned intine

polle n grain in pol: ir view endopores (left and right) and

—L. TE! d

lalongate

mesocolpial and polar plates.

(left) and mesocolpial exine m N

. Mascarenhasta arborescens pores with weak annulus (arrow). —N. Exi P nt showing part of psilate, sparse n perforate tec 1155 inner side beset with diverseh

Volume 94, Number 1 2007

Endress et al. 19 Phylogenetic Analysis of Alyxieae

from other tribes of Rauvolfioideae) include the simple style head, which is uniformly secretory and receptive and lacks a pollen-trapping annulus at the base (vs. the style head differentiated. into distinct morphological and functional zones, with the re- ceptive region located beneath an annulus at the base). Except for Plectaneia, Alyxieae seeds have a tough and usually conspicuously ruminate endo- sperm (vs. a smooth and soft endosperm in Vinceae). within Rauvolfioideae were so

1895:

it was

Because tribes artificial in earlier classifications (Schumann,

Pichon, 1949a, 1950b: 19944).

impossible to understand the evolution of secondary

Leeuwenberg,

chemistry in this subfamily. As tribal cireumscriptions become more natural, it is now possible to gain a better understanding of the phylogenetic. pattern of indole alka-

for Rauvol-

alkaloids and cardenolides. Generally, indole loids are considered to be characteristic fioideae. However, indole alkaloids characterize only five of the tribes included in this study (Alstonieae. Tabernaemontaneae, Vinceae, Hunterieae, and Melo- dineae). whereas indole alkaloids have not been reported in the other three tribes (Fig. 6). Acokanthera and Carissa L. contain cardenolides. Based on their

syncarpous gynoecium, they were conventionally included with indole alkaloid-containing genera in 1994a). Here and in other phylogenetic studies (Endress et al.,

1996; Potgieter Albert, 2001; 2007),

the Carisseae sensu Endress and Bruyns (2000) are

a polyphyletic Carisseae (Leeuwenberg,

Simóes et al.,

placed with other taxa in which indole alkaloids have been lost or replaced by other secondary compounds (Johns et al., 1968; Hegnauer, 1970; Coppen & Cobb, 1983; Kisakürek et al., 1983; Jensen, 1992).

All genera of Vinceae contain various complex indole alkaloids (Hegnauer, 1970, 1989; Ganzinger & 1976; Kisakürek et al., 1983). In contrast, all Alyxieae studied for secondary chemistry

Hesse, genera of lack indole alkaloids. Alyxia and Lepiniopsis contain 1970, 1989),

and although Lepinia has never been analyzed for

coumarins (Johns et al., 1968; Hegnauer, secondary compounds, the crushed leaves are known to emit a strong coumarin scent (D. Lorence, pers. comm., 1999). Coumarins are absent from Plectaneia,

and no reliable data are available on the secondary

CHARACTER EVOLUTION

Gynoecium, fruit, and seed morphology are com- plex and homoplasious in Rauvolfioideae. In this analysis, the plesiomorphic state of the gynoecium is apocarpous, in concurrence with Potgieter and Albert (2001: but see Sennblad & Bremer, 2000, 2002, for an alternative view), and the majority of the genera are apocarpous. Even in the small sample here, almost every clade includes at least one syncarpous genus; similar findings are reported by Simóes et al. (2007).

The style head is a useful character for distinguish- n Apocynaceae (see Fig. 10), but it is

me

ing genera structurally complex, making it difficult to break down into meaningful character states for coding morpho- logical characters. The two taxa sister to the rest in this analysis, Vallesia and Aspidosperma, have a simple style head that is vertically undifferentiated. A simple Alyxieae and for the Hunterieae and Carisseae (Fallen, 1986; 1996; 2000). A

similar type of style head is found in some (but not all)

style head 1s also characteristic for all

Endress et al., Endress & Bruyns,

genera of Alstonieae and Plumerieae. Tabernaemon-

~ ~ =

va s.l., as currently circumscribed by Leeuwenberg (1991, differentiated style head, such as the species included

1994b), includes species with a simple, un-

in this study, as well as ones with a complex,

vertically differentiated style head with distinct functional regions and a broad pollen-trapping flange at the base (e.g.. all the New World species). These results indicate that style head specialization has probably evolved in parallel in various clades of Rauvolfioideae, as was suggested by Potgieter and

Albert (2001), and that this probably has proceeded in

=

both directions (Fig.

Within Alyxieae, Lepinia and Lepiniopsis have a 3- to 5-carpellate ovary, which is partially to d A 3- to 5-carpellate ovary is otherwise b in duae:

All other

syncarpous, respectively (Endress et al.,

ynaceae only in Pleiocarpa (Hunterieae). genera have two carpels.

Fruit optimized: Vallesia has naked seeds in a small juicy

type and seed margin are equivocally

drupe, whereas Aspidosperma has thick woody follicles and seeds with a diaphanous wing. This is in ge the be of

Carisseae (a conglomeration of Willughbeieae, Melo-

contrast to the traditional view of

dineae, Hunterieae, and Carisseae, sensu Endress &

chemistry of. Pteralyxia, Chilocarpus, and Condylo- carpon.

Pes

sized granules, and endoannulus (arrow). —O

ecto- and endoannulus; innermost exine layer consists of granu the intine contains numerous radially oriented dark inclusions (arrow). O.

granular infrate C tum;

scale bar = 5 um in K, M; scale bar = 1 Um in B, C, E,

TEM section through exine and intine near pore; exine is thickened into an

les or irregular elements that are separated from tectum by

Scale bar = 10 um in A, D, G-

STYLE HEAD BODY C] undifferentiated MH Differentiated E Equivocal

Figure 10. Evolution of style head body differentiation and pollen aperture type mapped onto the single most parsimonious tree from the combined analysis of morphological and molecular : ) ) | | YI PI 2 I j I E

data using ACCTRAN optimization.

Micron

CIL epiniopsis OPteralyxia OPlectaneia Chilocarpus Condylocarpon

OPicralima

POLLEN

Colporate

Annulate porate Non annulate porate EN inaperturate

DT abernaemontana

ill Alstonia DAspidosperma

100 OVallesia

po qODoOoDoOoqoqQ 2 2

USPIBE) jeoiuejog unossi|A

ay} Jo sjeuuy

FRUIT TYPE

ehiscen follicle or capsule Ma Fleshy dehiscent follicle or capsule

E Equivocal

Figure 11. Evolution of fruit type and seed margin mapped onto the single most

ACCTRAN optimization.

Geniostoma

Ej OOOO

O Acokanthera

Im Kibatalia

Po II Mascarenhasia

100 du

100

E Condylocarpon

il Craspidospermum O Picralima

O Pleiocarpa

(3 Cabucala

EJ Petchia

O Molongum

E Tab

ll Alstonia Bl Aspidosperma B Vallesia

SEED MARGIN C] Naked

EN Fimbriate

parsimonious tree from the combined analysis of morphological and molecular data using

20082

| JequinN FE euinjoA

eealXÁ|V jo sisÁjeuy oneusBojAyd

"Je Ja sselpuy

Le

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Bruyns, 2000) as the most unspecialized fruit type in the family. Vinceae are homogeneous with regard to seed margin, with the seeds being unwinged (see Simóes et al., 2007, regarding Kamettia and Tonduzia. not included here). analysis, the seeds are enclosed an indehiscent

Only

having delicate, papery dehiscent follicles (Fig. 11). 8 paper Pig

drupe. Catharanthus and Vinca deviate, in

Catharanthus and Vinca also have a derived herba- ceous habit, whereas the other genera in Vinceae are

trees or shrubs.

The seed Alyxieae (Fig. 11).

specialized genera

margin is evolutionarily plastic ii

The four morphologically most

Alyxia, "epu Lepiniopsis, and ll have

distinctive. cylindrical. seeds that are qu

Pteralyxia, as well as C a

rolled with a deep hilar groove. Plectaneia. in contrast, has flat seeds with a wing at each end. In

Chilocarpus the seeds have a small pink corky aril on

the funiculus and are presented in an unusual type of

leathery dehiscent fruit that splits apart along one or

Arils are rare ir

two valves (Leeuwenberg, 2002). Apocynaceae, otherwise known only in Tabernaemon- taneae. Similar types of fruits are known as display 1983: Smith, 2000) al.. 2000) or as & Green,

fruits in Gesneriaceae (Wiehler.

and Melast (Clausing e dehiscent berries in Oleaceae (Lawrence 1993: Li et al.. 2002). Seed

Plumerieae (Pichon,

margins also 1940b,

this

vary 1950b

diversity ir

considerably in

contrast to

as Cerberoideae). In

Rauvolfioideae, in Apocynoideae and all other

subfamilies, the fruit and seed type is uniform: the fruit is a pair of follicles (rarely postgenitally united) that dehisce to release small, comose seeds. Palynologically, starting from the basic regular 3- colporate condition typical in the Rauvolfioideae (Figs. 8. 9; Nilsson, 1986), an entire suite of changes (Fig. 10):

pollen grain sha ye irre ular, aperture number mostly D J

characterizes the derivation of Alyxieae

two (sometimes three), and ectoapertures porate with thickened margins (Fig. 7). Within the clade, several other characters change: maximum pore diameter is 9 um in Chilocarpus, 12 um in Plectaneta, and 21— 33 um in the subclade including Alyxia, Pteralyxta, Lepinia, and Lepiniopsis. Possibly due to paedomor- phosis, Condylocarpon pollen is inaperturate (van der Ham et al., 2001). Together with the larger maximum also shows much

pore diameter, the Alyxia clade

larger. barrel-shaped (two pores) or depressed (three

or four pores) pollen grains, an endexinous inner exine

layer with a granular surface, and an indistinct (reduced) infratectum. Within the Alyxia clade, there is a change toward a more heavily sculptured tectum in the subelade including Alyxia, Pteralyxta. Lepinia.

and Lepiniopsis, from psilate in Alyxia, via undulate in

In the genera included in our

Pteralyxia, toward + verrucale in Lepinia and

Lepiniopsis. Pollen of the last two genera mostly has more than two apertures: three (less often two)

Lepiniopsis and three or four in Lepinia (van der Ham 2001).

aperture conditions, as the apertures are still irregular

et al., This is not simply a reversal lo basic

or diverse within a single grain regarding size, configuration, and orientation.

The functional significance of the remarkable shift in pollen morphology toward and within Alyxieae is not understood. The oldest fossils of the Alyxia pollen type date from the Paleocene of northwestern Borneo

(Muller.

age of the syndrome.

1981). which demonstrates the considerable

CLASSIFICATION

The topologies of this study support recognition of Vinceae and Endress and (2000). as Anechites from either tribe and their. placement in (2007) respectively. Our results do not support Rhazya in

si these two genera are not supported in any

Alyxieae sensu Bruyns

well as the exclusion of Vallesia and

Aspidospermeae sensu Simões et al. and

Plumerieae,

inclusion of Amsonia and Vinceae:

` the other included in this study. The

^

groups end of Amsonia was also not resolved in the study by Simoes et al. (2007).

Amsonia and Rhazya remains equivocal, these genera

Because the position. of are withdrawn from Vinceae and left unplaced for the time being. Although it is unsatisfying to leave them in limbo, a classification should reflect phylogeny, so it seems best to keep them as unplaced genera until

more data are available to place them more definitely.

Literature Cited

hoterena. 2007. the jae Ee Thevetia species on morphology. Ann.

Alvarado-Cárdenas. V phyloge-

netic analysis of complex

(Plumerieae: Apocynaceae) based Missouri Bot. Gard. 1 (ir px Arambewela, 1 & alkaloids from Tabe 'rnaemontana g istry 30: 1740— cape Silva. 19

Indole

nalunge. 199] Phytochem-

=

A. Muzaffar, K. T. 98 Alkaloids of Petchia ceylanica. istry 28: -a 2

D. Desilva & W. 5. J.

Phytochem-

Parveen, S. Habiburrehman.

Choud hary & A. Pervin. 1991. Alk:

Phytoc he mistry 30: 1285-1293. Armbruster, 99

—— ———, K. Zaman, Muzaffar., M. | ER from Rhazya stricta. W. 8. ¿xaptation, adaptatie

| homoplasy: E UH of ecologie al trails in Dalechampia | & | |

fforc

vines. Pp. 227-243 i anderson

(editors), ee "The os of deis. in

Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego. Backlund. M.. B. Oxelman & B. Bremer. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships within the Gentianales based on ndhk and bel, sequences, with particular reference to the Logania-

J. Bot. 87: 1029-1043

ceae. Amer.

Volume 94, Number 1 2007

Endress et al. a Analysis of Alyxieae

Bisset, N. G. 1987. Phytoche mistry of Nerium L. Agric. Univ. Wageningen Pap. 87(2 3.

P. 1981. Apocynaceae.

rs), Flore de V ).

PE i= A. Aubréville & J.-F. Calédonie d'Histoire

In Nouvelle National

Boiteau,

ee

. 1948. 5 nt of the perianth in Vinca ea L. Amer. J. Bot : 413-423.

Bren mer, B. & O. E P pus Evolution of fruit characters

and dispersal modes in the tropical family Rubiaceae.

Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 47: 79-95.

& L. Struwe. 1992, Phylogeny of the Rubiaceae and the Loganiaceae: Congruence or conflict between morpho- logical and molec er a a? Amer. J. Bot. 79: 1171-1184

Chase, M. W. & H. lills. 1991. Silica gel: An ideal desiccant for preserving s Id-collected leaves for use in molecular studie S. Taxon 40: 215-220.

Les,

nO 5 G. Olmstead, i Morgan, D. H.

. B. D. 1 Duvall, R. A. Price, H. G. Hills, Y.- L. Qiu, K. A. y H. Rettig, E. : onti, J. D. Palmer, J. 85 3 x 1 p 11 J. Michaels, W Kress. K. G. Karol, . Clark, Hedrén, B. S. Gaut, R. K. : d 8 G E mpee, J. F. Smith, G. R.

Graham, S. C. H. Barrett, S. Dayanandan & V. A. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An 2 nucleotide s from the plastid gene hel, Ann.

860 Missouri Bot. Ga "n 80 528-5 Church, A. H. 1908. Types of Floral Mec hanism J. Clarendon Press, Oxford. Civeyrel, L. 1996, Phylogénie des Ascle Dd eae, Approche

Ph.D. The Université

Palynologique et Moléculaire. sis,

Montpellier H. Le Thomas, K. Ferguson & M. W. 1998. Critical ree xamination of palynologic al characters used to delimit Asclepiadaceae to molecular phylogeny sin d from plastid mask £ sequences. Molec.

Chase.

in compa

Phylogen. Evol. 9: 51 aa

Clausing, ( I I . Renner. 2000. Correlations among fruit traits and 1 of different fruits within Melastomataceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 303-326.

Conn, B. J. 1980. A taxonomic revision of Geniostoma ( 26: 2 pes :

The occurrence of

I

Loganiaceae , Blumea 2 & A. Cobb.

E -oppen, 1 in pom und 1 P 28.

125.

iytochemistry 22:

Vols. 1

Corner, E. J. H. 1976. The Seeds of Dicotyledons, and 2. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. ud M. D. 1983. Notonerium (Apocynaceae) laid to rest in

Adelaide Bot. Gard. 6: 189—191. 'graled System of Classification of N

J. A rudes A. 1981. An Int Flowering POS Columbia Univ.

e Boraginaceae.

Press, New Yor

and Auct esse

Degener, O. 1946. Apocynacea: Families 305 and 306. In Degener (editor), Flora Hawaiiensis: The New Illustrated Flora of the Hawaiian Islands, eu 1—4. Publ. priv., Honolulu

Doyle, & J. L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation

procedure “for small quantities of fresh leaf tis Phytoe m. Bull. Bot. Soc. Amer. 19: 11-15. El-Ghazaly, G. 1990. Development dl pollen grains of Catharanthus roseus (Apocynaceae). Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 64: 165-174.

Endress, M. E. & P. Bruyns. 2000. A revised classification of

ancaster) 66: 1—56

the a s.l. Bot. Rev. (I

1990.

M. Hesse, S. Nilsson, A. Guggisberg & J.-F 1u. The systematic position of the 1 ninae (Apocynaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 171: 157-185

. D. H. Lorence & P. K. Endress.

(=

1997. Structure and

Ner

de element of the gynoecium of Lepinta marquisensis and

its syste matic position in the Apocynaceae. Allertonia 7:

267-272.

———, B. Sennblad, S. Nilsson, L. Civeyrel, M. W. Chase, Huysmans, E. Graftstróm & B. Bremer. 1996. A phylogen netic analysis of Apocynaceae s. str. and some

related taxa in Gentianales: A multidisc ‘iplinary approach. " era Bot. 3 59-102.

Endres 996. Homoplasy in angiosperm flowers. Pp. 3 in M. J. Sanderson & L. Hufford (editors), Homoplasy: The Recurrence of Similarity in Evolution. Ac ade mic Press, San Diego.

apela systematic character? Bot.

a 12: 417—451.

NUS Endres & A. J. M. Leeuwenberg. 1992.

Apocynaceae. Pp. 1 in R. Spichiger & L. Ramella

(editors), Flora del Mid Vol. 17. Conservatoire et

Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Conve: Geneva: Missouri

Botanical Garden, St. Louis.

Fallen, M. E. 1983a.

( ous ynaceae). Brittonia 9 25 >: 22 3l.

1983b. A t revision. of .

(Apocynaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 70: 149-169 development and systematic 12:

. J. Bol

5 C.

'stematic revision of Anechites 2

axonomic

1985. The gynoecial position of Allamanda (Apocynaceae). Amer 572-579.

. 1986. Floral structure in Apocynaceae: Morpholog- ic cal, m EO and evolutionary aspects. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 106:

Fay, M. Dd 7 Bayer, W. Alverson, A. Y. de S Swensen & M. ^ Chase. pu rbcL

indicate : a ws ees E Diegodendron ami Bixa.

S. M.

eque nces

Taxon ¢ joan I 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An 1 8 n using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791. Fitch, V 971. Toward defining the course of 5 ung ds for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 2 406—410.

mes P. I. & J. B. Williams. 1996. Apocynaceae. Pp. 104—

96 in A. E. Orchard (editor), Flora of Australia, Vol. 18. Ea CSIRO, Melbourne. Fosbe R. P. Boiteau & M.- Sachet. 1977. ace lanis of the Ochrosiinae (Apocynaceae): 2. Synonymy of Ochrosia Juss. and Neisosperma Raf.

Adansonia, | 2 17: 23-33. Ganzinger, D. Hess se. 1976. A chemotaxonomic study of

the sublamily eee eae of the Apocynaceae. Lloydia

. W. II. (Apocynac eae). M.Sc. Gunn, 1 5 Tr

1969. A Revision of the Genus Thevetia The is, Connecticut, Storrs H. 'Tsema, C. &

1002. Families em genera of spermato- phytes ee by the Agricultural Research Service Techn. Bull. U.S.D.A. 1796: 71- zs Haber, W. A. 15 5 Pollination by deceit in a mass-flowering tropical tree Plumeria rubra (Apocynaceae). Biotropica 16: 69-275

niv. itchie

O ES

Hegnauer, R. 1970. Cardenolide und Bufadienolida (= 9 Verbreitung und systematische Bedeutung. E ur 19: 137—153. e der Pflanzen 8. Birkháuser,

1

24

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Hendrian.

2004. Revision of Ochrosta (Apocynaceae) Blumea 49: 1 a

Homberger, K. & M. Hesse. 1984. n aus der 3 d Acla 67: 237-24é Apocynaceae of Taiwan 2: A

Malesia. Kopsirachin, ein ungewöhnliches Kopsia dasyrachis Ridl. Helv. Chim. Huang, T. C. 1986. The palynological study. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Imp. Univ., Ser. 4, Biol. 39: 75-102. Hufford, L. 1997. The

origins of floral homoplasies. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 505-580

roles of ontogenetic evolution in the 58(Suppl. 6): IO

Jensen, S. R. 1992, Systematic implications of the distribu-

tion of iridoids and other chemical compounds in the Loganiaceae and other families of the Asteridae. Ann.

Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 284—302. Johns, S. R., J. E Lamberton, , 1968. Identification of coumarins isolated from Bou do

. Price & . Sioumis.

ternatensis (Apocynaceae), Pterocaulon sphacelatum (Com- positae), and / 10 7 melanophlota (Rutaceae). Austral. J. Chem. 21: B

Johnson, L. A. E » 5. Soltis. 1994. math DNA sequen neces

and phylogenetic reconstruction in Saxifragaceae s.s. Syst Bot. 19: 143-156

Kam, T. S., K. T. Nyeoh, K. M. Sim K. Yoganathan. 1997. 70 from Alstonia scholaris. Phytochemistry 45: 1303-13

Kelchne A. 2000. The e Mot ist DNA ipe its apne ation in plant systematics. . Missouri Bot. Gard. 87: 482-498 Krak k, M. V., A.

chemotaxonomie

evolution of non-coding

eee ers & M. Hesse. 1983

investigation of the plant families d

qun ynaceae, Loganiaceae, and Rubiac eae by their indole alkaloid content. Pp. 211-376 in W. W. Pelletier (editor), Alkaloids: Chemie al and Biological Perspectives, Vol. | pee New York

Koch,

12 5 7

. 2002. Estudios das Espécies Neotropic als do Género

. (Apocynaceae). Ph.D. Thesis. Universidade

Estadual del ampinas. Lawrence, T. J. & P. 1 Mi The anatomy v W A : 53-97.

l E > vision of Tabernaemon-

^M al World Species.

a dehiscent berry. Leeuwenberg, A. tana, Vol. !: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. . 1994a. XXXVIII.

level. Wageningen Agric.

Series of revisions of Apocynaceae

Taxa of the Apocynaceae above the genus

Univ. Pap. 94(3): 45—00. 1994b. A Revision of Tabernaemontana, Vol. 2: The

New World Species. Royal Botanic q 1997

Gardens. Kew. XLIV.

Gonioma E. Mey.,

Series of revisions of Apocynaceae Craspidospermum Boj. ex A. DC., Mascarenhasia A. DC., Petchia livera, Plectaneia Thou. and Sa iE Baill. Wageningen Agric. Un Pan; 97

[pon Series of revisions. of l. hilos arpus. Syst. & Geogr. Pl & P. W. Leenhouts. 1980.

J. M. Leeuwenberg (editor),

Apocynaceae L

72: 127-166.

'axonomy. Pp. 8-96 in A

Engler and Prantl’s Die

natürlic hen Pflanzenfamilien, Fam. Loganiaceae, Vo 28b(1). Eu ker & Hur nd Berlin. Li, J., J. H. Alexander, HI D. Zhang. 2002. Paraphyletic

Syringa e eae): Evidence from sequences of nuc 5 Ar IS E 1. Be

digit DNA Y and ETS regions. Sys M.

Lin, S. & G. Bernardello. Flower

1999. strueture and

reproductive. biology in Aspidosperma que m us

(Apocynaceae), a tree ela d by deceit t J. PL Sci 160: 809-878.

A

Lorence, D. H. a Wagner. 1997. (Apocynaceae), un description of a new species from the 1 Islands.

986

A revision of Lepinia

Allertonia 7: 254-260.

DN

Familie Apocynaceae Juss. in Vietnam. 55 il | Alle meiner Teil. Feddes Repert. 97: 235-273. Maddison. J& 2000. MacClade 4

ae ny m character evolution. Sinauer Pm Jales

. Maddison. : Analysis Sunde land. Markgraf,

Apocynaceae

Massac huse ‘tts. 97

Malesianae Praecursores LI. 1-5: Mida ue xu 19: 156-1065. : . Humbert & J.-F. (editors). Flore de 1 el m. Comores. Fam. 109. Muséum National d' i: Naturelle, Paris.

197

Apocynaceae V. Ochrosta. oni Blumea 25: SAT

970. Apocynaceae. /

Praecursores LIX.

233-

Florae Malesianae

ari. & K. 1975.

von KOH, flavida Bl. Bot.

Huber.

Die Entwicklung der “Nasen- Jahrb. Syst. 96:

CORA A alk. 1989.

ae ed. Oxford Univ.

Anatomy of the Press, Tu 1-153. in T.

Thail: i Vo

Apocynaceae.

E Sosa

S

if (editors). Flora of 70). Diamond D Bangkok

2000. Revision of Alyxia (Apocynaceae). Part l: Blumea 45: 1-146.

Revision of

arsen

Asia Malesia. 102

EIS

2002. (Apocynaceae). Part 2: "Blume: a 47: 1-93. V revision of Kopsia (Apocynaceae: . Harvard Pap. Bot. 9: 89-142,

Muller, J. 1981. Fossil pollen records of extant angiosperms.

pane 1 and Australia. 2004. Rauvol-

fioideae)

Bot. Rev. ion aster) 47: 1-145. Nilsson, S. 1986. ‘The oo ‘ance of a n. morphology in the Apocynaceae. Pp. 359-374 in S. Blackmore & J. K.

Ferguson (editors), | n i and 50 8 Form and Function.

Academic Press. London

Nishino, E. 1982. Corolla aba formation in six species of Rb ari Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 95: 117.

Olmstead, G.. B. Bremer. K. M. Scott & J. D. Palmer. 1993. E parsimony analysis of re is edi sensu Fi based on Thel, sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. ¢ 700-722.

1996.

O of Apocynaceae in Africa, Pt. 2. A monograph ol

Omino, E. ^ contribution to the leaf anatomy ane

*lelocarpinae (Seri of i "Univ. Pay

985 du rs.

visions of Apocynaceae XLI). 96(1): 81-178 Agric.

Wageningen Agric. Pagen, F. J. J. 1987. Wageningen P . 87-2: 1-25 Pichon. M. 194 7a. m fication ade "s AG vnacces: II. Genre dl Bull. Soc. Be 94: 31-39 Vb. C lies ‘ation des e II. Genre

m Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat... 4 sér. 2. 19: 205-212.

Nerium L. Univ.

. France

1947e. Classification des Alstonia el genres voisins. Bull. 294-30

19484. Classification des Apocynacées: I.

Apocynacées: IV. Genre

Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. 19:

Carissées

et wee Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., B, Bot. 24: 11-18 10 ee C a talion E 8 ee, V. Cerbér- N Notul. (Paris) 13: 2 229.

1948c. E. caracteres S. genre Plectaneta (Apoc- yn Notul. Syst. (Paris) 13: 255-257 948d. Classification des Apocynacées: XIX. Le Echitoidées. Bull. Soc. Bot.

En des France 95:

216.

Volume 94, Number 1 07

Endress et al. 25 Phylogenetic Analysis of Alyxieae

. 1949a. Classification des Apocynacées

volfiées, d 9 m es e 4 Tabernaémontanées. Mém. Mus. Natl. . Nat. 24: 153-251. 1949b. C jenem ‘ation des pos ynacées: XXVII. Déter ‘rmination des graines de 1 el de Cerbéroidées. Bull. Tn Nat. Hist. Natl. 21: 266-269. 949c. Classification des a XXIX. Le genre heal Bull. M list. Na ——— 950a. ea des Apoc ra Ces: XXV jd a2 Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. B. -143. 195 XXVIII. Mus. Natl. Hist.

——— Jb. Classification des b. ées: Büsblé ment aux Plumérioidées. Mém. 1 5-166. 1950c. fruit ES 's genres “i 91-29

Natl.

Classification des Apocynacées: XXXI. Le

Bull. Mus. Nat. Hist.

etia et Ahouat.

a ‘ation des Apocynacées: XXXIII Le

D ds des Carissées. Notul. Syst. (Paris) n 310—315 Potgieter, K. & V. A. Albert. 2001. Phylogenetic relation-

ships within > pere eae s.l. based on trnL intron and tri spacer sequences and propagole characters. Ann Missouri. Bot. Card. 88: 523—54€

W.. S. S. Nilssor

Glossary of Pollen and Spore l.

P . Le Thomas. 1994.

_. LPP Contribu- tions No. PP s Utrecht.

Reeves, G., P. comet May, i V: Molecular systematics of Iridaceae: plastid s regions. Amer. J. Bot. 8

Rogers, G. 1986. pac s United States. J. 18

unt, S. Blackmore,

2001.

m . = E =) O c N o

1 O YD

=

aceae i the

Arbor. 67: 143-

‘he genera of BA Arnold

35.

Hosatti, T. J. 1989. (Apocynaceae and Asclepiadaceae) in the southeastern United States. 4 Arnold Arbor. 70: 307-514.

Rudjiman. 198 Beaumontia

The genera of suborder Apocynineae

>

Wallich

evision of . son 90e

Kibatalia G. Don. and Vallariopsis 9 85 Agric. Univ. Wageningen Pap. 8605): 1—96

"m Marcot, M. A., K. M. Solin Allard. 1984.

DUNT in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal

Natl. Acad. S

nan, R. A. 1 & R. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length poly-

loc ation, and popu ation dynamics. Proc. U.S.A. 81: 8014

Salamin, N., 2003.

R. Hodkinson & V. $

Assessing e support with ee prre netic 27: 528-539,

a T. Savolainen. A T HUN e een. Evol.

Savolainen, V., l. Chase, C. M. Morton, s. B. Hoot, D. E.

Soltis, C. Bay e^ F. Fay A de Bruijn, S. Sullivan & Y.-

L. Qiu. 2000. . Phyloge netics of flow vering plants based upon a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst. Biol. 49: 306-362.

Schick, B. 19: 30. Untersuchungen über die Biotechnik der

Apocynaceenblüte. 1. poe und Funktion des Narbenkopfes. Flora 172

Schill, R. & U. Jäkel. 1978 Asclepiadaceen-Pollinarien. 22:

-122

Se es K. X

Beitrag zur Kenntnis der

Trop. Subtrop. Pflanzenwelt

Asclepiadaceae. (editors), Die

Engelmann,

)5. Apocynaceae and

—306 A. Engler & K. Prantl

1 hen P flanzent amilien, Vol. 4(2 Leipzig.

-—! b. 1997. Phylogeny of the Apocynaceae s.l. (Ph.D.

'hesis summary). Acta Universitas Uppsaliensis, Compre-

Faculty of

hensive Summaries Uppsala Dissertations. ia.

Science and Technology 295, Uppsa

& B. Bremer. 1996. gat of Apocynac eae and lepiadaceae evalu- 3-17

The familial and subfamilial

ated with rbcL data. Pl. Syst. Evol. : 153-175.

& 2000. Is a a differential a priori weighting in coding sequences? -A Syst. Biol. 49:

justific ation or

case study from rbcL and Apocynaceae s.l. $

-113. &

. Classification of Apocynaceae s

according to a new approach Rr Linnaean and phyloge netic o Syst. Biol. 51: 389—409.

| s& B. Bienes ph Morphology and TEM CEN in . fraternity: The tribe Wrightieae (Apocynaceae) revisited. Amer. J. Bot. 85: trs 2

E

Allorge, B. David, K. Awang, A. Hamid, A.

Hadi, ña “an je J. C. Quir H. Schaller & : A preliminary chem ee review of

"ni (Apocynaceae) J. Ethn : 147-18:

Sidiyasa, K. 1 of Alstonia fab, Blumea, Suppl. 11: 1—

Simoes, A. O, J. E. 1 2007. Phylogeny amd systematies of lone ene (Apocyna-

non, F. Remy,

opharmacol. . Taxonomy, phylogeny, and ie pie

Livshultz, E. Conti

ceae) based on molec ular and morphological evidence. Ann. es Bot. . 94 (in press). Smith. 88. Flora "Vitie nsis Nova—A New Flora of Fiji

-k n Vol. 4. Pacific Tropical Botanical Garden, . A 5 phylogenetic analysis of tribes Beslerieae unt Napeantheae (Gesneriaceae) and evolution

of fruit types: Parsimony and maximum liklihood analyses

2

idhF sequences. Syst. Bot. 25: 72— . 18 Pp. 19- 50 i in A. Engler & K. Prantl le ditors), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Vol.

n Solereder. H 2. Loganiaceae. 4. 2nd ed. Engelmann, Leipzig Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, M. W.

Albach. M. 11 8 V. 5 W.

M. F. Fay, M. Axtell, S W. Kress, K a Nixon & 5 S. 2000. 3 from 188 DNA, P. and atpB

sequences. Bot. J. Lin e. 133: 38146

Stapf, O. 1902. Aucun cene: Pp. 24 pe. x 1 5 Dyer (e London.

n s i E. Mort, D. lahn, 8. E Tie ot, . Swense n, 55 a Prince, Je

phylogeny inferred

2

itor), Flora of Tropical Africa, Vol. 4. L. Reeve,

. Albert & B.

family level 1 of Gentianales.

1994. Cladistics and Cladisties 10:

Struwe, L., V. Bremer.

175—

Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using

parada (* and other methods), version 4.0b. Sinauer ssociates, Sunderlanc Taberlet, Pn L. Gielly, 3 Pautou & J. Bouvet. 1991.

Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Pl. Molec. Biol. 17: 1105-1109. Valeton, T. nt à la famille des T mnacées. Ann. Jard. Bot. Buit enzorg 12: 249-253: t. 1, I van der Ham, R. W. J. M.,

1895. Description d'un nouveau genre apparte-

. Nilsson &

iology m vlogs of

Zimme rman, S

=

i. -M. Igersheim. 2001. Pollen morp e Alyxieae (Apocynaceae). Grana 40: 169-19 Bs R. L. & H. T.V. iter. 2001. jos meh

of the Periploc des: Secamonoideae and /

19 5

deae E cd a Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 88: 509

Wagner, W. L., D. 1990. Manual

. Herbst & S. H. pu . Univ. of Hawaii

of the Flowering p lanis of Hawari, Vol.

Press/Bishop Museum Press, 11

26 Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden Wiehler, 1983. A synopsis of the neotropical Gesner- Condyloc arpon isthmicum (Vell) A P lace E 'Ibyana 6: 1-249. razil, Koch s.n. (Z) FS; Brazil. Hatschbach 13030 (Z) W sadsad. Ir. 1933. Studies in the Apocynaceae IV. M, SEM, TEM The oe an genera of Echitoideae. Ann. Missouri Bol. Craspidospermum P dado s ex A, DC Gard. er 605-79% adagascar, Civeyr (Z) FS, LM, SE M, TEM

An interim

5l. 015 in the Apocynaceae VIII. revision of the genus ee Mart. & Zucc. Ann. 5 Bol. Gard. : )-206.

“ches, M., K. Me 1 nd E Sl.

Richard, C. 1995. Vallesia glabra. Pl.

Moretti, J. M. Alkaloids from leaves Med. (Stuttgart) 61:

Lemenolivier.

and stems of

89— e

Zhu, J.- Guggisberg, M. Kalt-Hadamowsky & M. Hesse. PUR C 15 motaxonomic study of the genus Tabernaemon-

their indole alkaloid

tana (Apocynaceae) based on

content. PL Syst. Evol. 172: 13-3: APPENDIX .

Voucher specimens used for morphologic al character

assessment in the Alyxieae study. Herbarium acronyms are in parentheses. Specimens used to study floral structure are indicated with FS, those used for light microscopy, scanning e le ctron. miseroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy indicated by LM, SEM, and TEM, respec live ly, following the he rbarium ac ronym. APOCYNACEAE

ee d 9 st.) Codd

ningen, Aas et al. s.n. (Z) ES eri mc 0 am.) Code Bayliss BRI 544 (S) LM, SEM.

Allamanda cathartica L.

of pollen grains are

cult. Gard.

South Africa, TEM

w, 1983, Fallen s.n. (Z) FS;

cult. Royal Bot. Gard. 0 (WAG) LM, SEM, TEM

Gabon, Leeuwenberg | Alstonia scholaris (L.) R. S “ult. Fairchild un a (L)

Gillis ee i) FS: New unea, Schodde 2 , TEN

G LM, SEM Alyxia mala Domin

Australia, das 835 (L) LM IM ruscifolia R.

ult. | 1 b Give 1055 (Z) ES: Australia, Clark

et al. 1753 (L) SEM, TEM Amsonia ciliata Walter

U.S.A., Sasseen s.n. (W AG) LM, SEM, Amsonia a ig eae Walter

cult. Bot. Gard. Zürich, Endress s.n. (Z) ES Anechites nertum m ) Urb.

5 16471 (Z) FS; Dominican Republic,

TEM

Ec uador,

van 15239 (S) LM, i e parti A. Brazil, Ferreira s.n. a a Brazil, Heringer 10672 (UB) LM, SEM Cabucala buio Ma rkgr ladagascar, Capuron 23701-5F (P) LM, SEM, TEM

Pl pobipérmia (Scott -E 71 v En ; Civeyrel 1281 (

Giod roseus (U G. De

Madagascar,

cult. Bot. Gard. Zurich, Endres s.n. (J) FS: Liberia, Van Harten 29 (WAG) I SEM, TEM Chilocarpus denudatus Blume. cult. B Gard. Bogor. Burck s.n. (Z) FS: India, Ridsdale 757 (L) LM: Java, Blume s.n. (L) LM: Java. ion. S) SEM; S ale Richards 1463 (L) TEM

at Chilocarpus al "ns Blume

Java, Hochreutiner 2547 ~ Z) FS Cond yloc arpon guyanense Des French Guiana, Sastre x (P22) ES

Kibatalia gitingensis (E 1 Woo dson

Philippines, Liede . s (Z) FS; Philippines, Wenzel 652 (G) LM, SEM, TEM Kopsia fruticosa (Ker p ) is Java, Prévost (Z pn n ictoria, Trinidad,

Broadway 5965 LM. a M. TE

Lepinia marquisensis Lorence & ign Fatu Hiva, Marquesas da Perlman 10271 (BISH. Z) FS

Lepinia solomonensis Hen

isl. Solomon Islands, BSIP 13496 (L) LM,

TEM Lepinia laitensis ecne. Soci Islands. Moorea. Perlman et al. 15071 (PTBG, 7) qo Islands. Tahiti, Whistler 4932 (BISH) a ternatensis Valet Moluc . Mochtar 306 (D LM. SEM: PNH 17362 (L) TE M

Lepiniopsis trilocularis Markgr. Palau Islands, Lorence 8265 (PTBG, Z) FS Mascarenhasia arborescens A. DC cult. Fairchild Bot. Gardi 2 n. (Z) FS; Madagascar, Schlieben 8128 (Z) LM, SEM: 22808-5F (P) LM. SEM, TEM Molongum laxum (Benth.) Pichon Venezuela, 13 pus 110 Z) FS; Colombia. Dunt 30207 7 (C OL) I SEM, TEM Visser pm TUE ) 18 & Sachet

Neill 5291 (J

Madagascar, Capuron

E aimea 5 tum, Hawaiian Is. . LM. SEM, TEN Motín y 1 " cult. Bot. Gard. Zurich. Fallen s.n. (Z) ES Segal 252 (WAG) LM, TEM: cult. Perpignan, Leeuwen- berg 12206 (WAG) LM, SEM, TEM Ochrosia coccinea (Teijsm. & Binn.) cult. Bogor Bot. Gard., FS, LM, SEM, TEM Petchia ceylanica (Wight) Livera ult. Bot. Gard. Kaiserslautern, Omlor s.n. „S: Sri Lanka. Wambeck 2510 (S) LM. Pic 1 1 5 e (Stapf) T. Durand & H. 1 cult. Bot. Gard. Wageningen. a 10779 (2) FS: Zaire, Gille 100 (BR) LM, SEM,

Plectaneta 0 Jum.

France,

30/8/1982 (Z)

Mic Java, anon. s.n.

E ui S. Il.

FS

ult. Madagascar, Pe lignat s.n. (Z Plectaneia thouarsii Roem. & Schult. Madagascar, Bernardi 11820 (L) LM. SEM, Pleiocarpa mutica Benth. cult. Bot. Gard. Wageningen, van Setten 415 (WAG, Z) FS: Ivory Cont Leeuwenberg 12145 (WAG) LM, SEM Plumeria rubra L.

TEM

ps Bot. Gard. Zurich, Fallen s.n. (Z) FS: Ghana, eeuwenberg 11089 i AG) LM, SEM, TEM e kauaiensis Cau m (Z) FS: Hawaii, Flynn 269

aual, Ds (PTBG) SEM

Preralyxta Do cea (Hillebr.) K. Se = M, TE!

^

Hawaii, Swezey s.n. (L) LM. M vomitoria Afze Ivory Coast. JJ. 337 (WAG) LM, SEM, berg 12122 (WAG) LM, SE

Aké , isi s.n. (Z) F

TEN:

; Nigeria, Leeuwenberg

Ivory Coast, Leeuwen-

Volume 94, Number 1 2007

Endress et al. 2 Phylogenetic Analysis of Alyxieae

Rhazya stricta De Yemen, ONE A A FS: Saudi Arabia, Schimper 812 (L) LM, SEM, TEM

Tabernae a iar (L.) R.

Br. ex Roem. & Schult. cult. Bot. Gard. ) FS

calcutta, anon. s.n. ( Tabernaemontana 12 9 om Lam. LM, SEM, TEM Thevetia peruviana (Pers.) E Schum. cult. Bot. Gard. Zurich, Fallen s.n., Florida, Gillis 9227 (S) LM, SEM, TE Vallesia pu An Woodson ult. Fairchild Trop. Gard, Zona s.n. (Z) FS; Florida, , 43415 5 (S) TEM Vallesia 77 (Cav. Link A. & H. Andersen 1009 (QCA) LM, SEM

ustra la, Alkin s.n.

e FS; cult.

alapagos Is.,

Vinca minor

(Z) FS: cult. ed SEM: cult.

cult. Zurich, Fallen s.n. Ne therlands, De Kort s.n. Nilsson s.n. (S) SE

Schipluiden, Sollentuna. Sweden, 11 major L. cult. Pijnacker, Netherlands, Van der Ham s.n. (L) LM. TEM GELSEMIACEAE

) J. St.-Hil. 28771 /) ES; i. (S) LM, SEM, TEM

Gelsemium sempervirens (L.) U.S.A., Louisiana, Tucker South Carolina, Wall. s

LOGANIACEAE

Geniostoma rupe: (J. R. Forst. & G.

B. J. Conn

Zealand, Garnock-Jones s.n. (WELTU, Z)

e New Zealand, NZ 9 (S) LM, SEM,

TEM

Forst.) var. ium n ( W 1

Nilsson

Annals

of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Voucher

Appendix 2.

specimens used for molecular analyses and GenBank accession numbers,

Taxon GenBank Accession No. APOCYNACEAE Voucher/Literature Citation math rbcL irnl, trnL-F Acokanthera oblongifolia Endress et al., 1996 Z70182 (Hochst.) Codd Sennblad & Bremer, 1996 X91758 Acokanthera oppositifolia Potgieter & Albert, 2001 AF214302 AF214148 (Lam.) Codd Mlamanda cathartica |. Endress et al., Z70190 Sennblad & B mer, e X91759 Allamanda det. Potgieter & Albert, 2001 AF214304 AF214150 Alstonia boonei De Wild. Potgieter & Albert, 2001 AF102374 AF214151 Alstonia scholaris (L.) R. Endress et al., 1996 Z70189 Br. Sennblad Bremer, 1996 X91700 Alyxia buxifolia R. Br Potgieter & Albert, 2001 AF214300 AF214152 Alyxia ruscifolia R. Br cult. Montpellier, Civeyrel 1055 1008375306 (TL) Sennblad Bremer, 2002 AJ419731 Amsonia tabernaemontana Potgieter & Albert, 2001 AF214307 AF214153 Walter P Royal Bot. Gard. Kew, AM295066 AM295078 Aveyrel 1057 (TL) Anechites nerium (Aubl) E & Bremer, 2002 \J419733 AM295087 A M295087 Urb. Aspidosperma quebracho- Potgieter & Albert, 2001 AF214319 AF214105 blanco Schltdl. Aspidosperma triternatum cult. Bot. Garden, Meise, Bremer AM295077 Rojas Acosta 3029 (UPS) Sennblad & Bremer, 2002 AJ419735 Cabucala polysperma Madagascar, Civeyrel 1281 (TL) AM295067 AM295079 AM295088 AM295088 (Scott-Elliot) Pichon Catharanthus roseus (L.) Potgieter & Albert, 2001 AF102392 AF214175 G. Don cult. Stockholm Univ., Bremer A M2950068 28 (UPS) Sennblad & Bremer, 1996 X91757 Chilocarpus suaveolens Endress et al., 1996 Z70184 X92445 Blume a m Gard. Bogor, Chase AM295089 AM295089 Condylocarpon ins & Albert, 2001 AF214337 AF214183 amazonicum (Markgr.) Ducke Condylocarpon guyanense French Guiana, M. F. Prevost s.n. 0837537 AM295080 esf. (CAY) Craspidospermum Madagascar, Civeyrel 1234 (TL) DQ837538 AM295090 295090 verticillatum Bojer ex Sennblad Bremer. 2002 AJ419743 A. DC. Kibatalia gitingensis Philippines, Liede 3268 (Z) AM295069 (Elmer) Woodson Sennblad & Bremer, 2002 AJ419745 Kopsia fruticosa cult. Bot. Gard. Meise, Bremer AM295091 AM295091 (Ker Gawl.) A. DC. 3033 (UPS Endress et al., 1996 Z70178 Sennblad & Bremer, 1996 X91763

Lepinia taitensis Decne. Lepiniopsis ternatensis ‘aleton

Lepiniopsis trilocularis Markgr

Sennblad Bremer, 2002 Potgieter Albert, 2001

Palau Islands, Lorence 8265 (PTBG)

AJ419746 AF214374

AM295081

AF214220

Volume 94, Number 1 Endress et al. 29 2007 Phylogenetic Analysis of Alyxieae

Continued.

Appendix 2.

GenBank Accession No.

Taxon APOCYNACEAE Voucher/Literature Citation matK rbcL irnl, irnL-F Mascarenhasta arborescens Potgieter & Albert, 2001 AF214378 AF214224 : cult. bs ageningen Agric. Univ., 1M295070 )-16, Setten 625 (WAG) one et al., 1998 AJ002885 Molongum laxum (Benth.) Potgieter & Albert, 2001 AF214383 AF214229 Pichon Endress et al., 1996 Z70185 X91765 Neisosperma nakaiana Potgieter & Albert, 2001 AF214385 AF214231 (Koidz.) Fosberg & Sachet Neisosperma oppositifolia cult. Nat. Trop. Bot. Gard., AM295071 | AM295082 Lam.) Fosberg & Kauai, Lorence s.n., NTBG Sachet 970511 (PTBG) Nerium oleander L. Fotgie ater & Albert, 2001 AF214386 AF214232 rel et al., 1998 798173 Sennblad et a 190 AJ002886 Ochrosia coccinea Sennblad & Bremer, 2002 AJ419752 (Teijsm. & Binn.) cult. Wageningen Agric. Univ AM295092 AM295092 Miq. nr. 78PTHB 354, van der Laan 389 (WAG) Petchia ceylanica (Wight) cult. Univ. Kaiserslautern, AM295072 AM295083 AM295093 AM295093 avera Germany, Omlor s.n. (Z) Picralima nitida (Stapf) T. Potgieter & Albert, 2001 AF214404 AF214250 Durand H. Durand Endress et al. 1996 Z70179 aha & Bremer, 1996 X91766 Plectaneia stenophylla Madagascar, Petignat s.n. (Z AM295084 Jum. Potgieter & Albert, 2001 AF214405 AF214251 Pleiocarpa mutica Benth. Potgieter & Albert, 2001 AF214407 AF214253 cult. Royal Bot. on Kew, DQ837539 Civeyrel 1086 (TI Sennblad & Pena E AJ419757 Plumeria alba Kunth Potgieter & Albe 01 AF214408 AF214254 Plumeria inodora Jacq. Sennblad & ipe 11 X91767 Plumeria rubra dress et al., 6 Z70191 Pteralyxia kauaiensis Kauai, Hawaii, Lorence 7768 AM 295073 | AM295085 AM295094 AM295094. aum (PTBG, Z) Rauvolfia mannii Stapf Endress et al., 1996 Z10181 Sennblad & Bremer, 1996 X91769 Rauvolfia serpentina Potgieter & Albert, 2001 AF214415 AF214261 Benth. ex Kurz Rhazya stricta Decne. Agosti 29 (Z) AM295074 AM295086 AM295095 AM295095 Tabernaemontana Potgieter & Albert, 2001 AF214431 AF214277 citrifolia L. Tabernaemontana Endress et al., 1996 Z70187 divaricata (L.) R. Br Sennblad & Bremer, 1996 X91772 ex Roem. & Schult Thevetia ahouai (L.) A. Potgieter & Albert, 2001 AF214435 AF214281 Bs etia peruviana Pers.) Endress et al., 1996 Z70188 . Schum. Sennblad & Bremer, 1996 X91773 1 antillana cult. o 1 Gard., AM295075 Woodson Meagher 966 (FTG Sennblad & eid 2002 AJ419767 AF214447 AF214293

Potgieter & Albert, 2001

30 Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Appendix 2.

Continued.

Taxon

APOCYNACEAE

GenBank Accession No.

Voucher/Literature Citation math rbeL trol, trnL-F Vinca minor L. cult. Bot. Gard. Uppsala, Sennblad AM295070 230 (UPS) Sennblad & Bremer, 2002 AJ419708 Potgieter & Albert, 2001 AF214449 AF214295 GELSEMIACEAE Gelsemium sempervirens Endress et al., 1996 Z10195 (L.) J. St.-Hil. Olmstead et al., 1993 1,14397 cult. Royal Bot. Gard. Kew AM2950960 AM295090 Civeyrel 1069 (TL) LOGANIACEAE Geniostoma rupestre J. R. Endress et al., 1996 Z 10194. 708828 “orst. & G. Forst. Wellington, New Zealand, AM295097 AM295097

Garnock-Jones 2200 (WELTU)

NDIX 3. Matrix based on the morphological character coding. For some genera more than one species was used for character e 'oding. a = species used to code characters 1-37 (the non- PP | SI |

E E ters): b = species used to code characters 38-54 (the pollen characters). See Appendices 1 and 4.

i 2 3 4 5 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234

Acokanthera 4i i A. oppositifolia” Allamanda cathar

Alstonia scholaris

Alyxia oblongata”, A. ruscifolia"

Amsonia ciliata", A. tabernaemontana? Inechites nerium

Aspidosperma parvifolium

Cabucala caudata”, C. polysperma" Catharanthus roseus

Chilocarpus denudatus*”, C. suaveolens* Condylocarpon guyanense*. C. isthmicum®” Craspidospermum verticillatum

Kibatalia gitingensis

Kopsia fruticosa

Lepinia marquisensis", L. solomonensis”, L. taitensis*"

Lepiniopsis ternatensis”, L. trilocularis’ Mascarenhasia arborescens

Wolongum laxum

Veisosperma nakaiana

Verium oleander

Ochrosia coccinea

Petchia ceylanica

Picralima nitida

Plectaneia stenophylla, P. thouarsii” Pleiocarpa mutica

Plumeria rubra

Pteralyxia kauaiensis*", P. macrocarpa” Rauvolfia vomitoria

Rhazya stricta

Tabernaemontana divaricata’, T. pandacaqui" Thevetia peruviana

Vallesia antillana*”, V. glabra”

Vinca major". V. minor Gelsemium sempervirens

Geniostoma rupestre

010000000000000010000000000000201101000020100110011001 112000011001100121111012010200200010001020000100101200 012000100000000020110012000300202120000020002010001100

012010000000000010000010101002020100001112210010322000 211000010000000021100012001000202130000020000210011200 1100010110000011201110120100002021???0?0200000001?1240 0110001000000000100100120102002010300000303001000?1201 012000000000000021100010100000001120000020001200011101 210000000000000021102012001001202130001020002200001201 1100100000100000100100120130011000???00112201010211100 1120000000100000100000121010021201???1010????0?1011200 012000100000000020110002000100202130010133001000011100 010002010101110230001012012013101100100023101000311200 0100000001000000211020111000001--130001020002100011101 QOTIIOOOUODOIDOODOTI000011T1101002020100001122?10010222010 011000000010000010000111101002020100001122210010322010 010001010100110230001012012013101100100023101010311000 0100010000011101213100100030003011???200031201010211100 012000000100000021200011100100101120000020002200001001 0120011101000102312100120120131011010001231010?0311000 012000000100000021200010100100101120001021200200001021

0120000000000000211000101000000011??200021001200211000 010001100000000010000011003000300120000021002000101040 11000000000000001000001201020100012??00112010010311100

0100001000000000100001110030003001300000210020001?1100 011000010000000010010002000200202010000020000110101201

0110000000000000100000111010020201???01112210010322000 012000000000000021101010100000001120001020003200011100 211000000000000021100012000100212120000020000210011200

0100010000100000100100100030013211400000200020?0211200 0110010110011011201110011132002020010010200000?0101230 0110000000000000110000111030002--030000030300000011200 210000000000000121102012001001200120001024023001001200 100100010200002-0---0012000200201120000020000000000250 0001020102000000000000020130012011???00023101010101100

2005

| JequinN 'p6 aUNIoA

eealxA|y jo sisÁ¡euy oneueBo|Aud

Je Jo ssejpu3

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

APPENDIX. 4.

Characters and character states for the mee sde val

matrix used in the cladistic analyses. See \ppen ix 3. cler states used in 15 study are

re characters and cha

based on the exemplar me ‘Goal only the characteristics of the

species used in the analysis are considered in assigning codes. In cases of large genera with a range of states. this is indicated here.

|. Habit:

perennial herbs.

Q = trees or shrubs: | lianas or vines: 2

The species used to represent Alyxta here.

A. ruscifolia, is a shrub: the great majority of. Alyxia species, us ver, are lianas. . Non-articulated laticifers: 0 = absent; | = present

| Ta articulated laticifers are one of the key characters that

distinguish Apocynaceae s.l. from other Gentianales.

3. Phyllotaxis: 0 = leaves opposite; | = leaves alternate: 2

= E verticillate. Some taxa have leaves that are

predominantly verticillate but may have some

with only two leaves. These taxa are coded as verticillate here

|l. Stipules: 0 = absent: 1 = present. Apocynaceae are

here considered to be estipulate in the sense of Cronquist (1981) and Rosatti (1989). The colleters or interpetiolar ridges found in some taxa are not considered to b

homologous with true stipules, nor are the adaxial outgrowths at the base of the petiole in Alstonia scholaris (Sidiyasa. 1998

some

Small bract- or scale-like organs that are found in species of Rauvolfia have sometimes been called

stipules. In a recent revision of the Neotropical species.

however, Koch (2002) argued convincingly that these organs are : be tter interpreted as cata phy lls.

5. Supernumerary bracteoles: 0 = absent: | = present. Supernumerary bracteoles are e ost rs of 15 acteoles on the

These bracteoles often re-

pedicel subtending the calyx. semble the sepals.

Calveine colleters: 0 = absent; 1 = several. across the inner fac e of the se pal (these sometimes coalesced at the base); 2 = few, mostly in the sepal sinuses. Calycine colleters are a common feature in Gentianales, and their lack

r presence and arrangement is often used in ir ynaceae genera (e.g Stapf, 1902 338-330; Eze ‘urra et al.,

38: Middleton, 1999, fig. 1). le

as an aid in distinguishing e 1933: Rosatti, A QO: Omino, 1996: 87

kei. gu ia ruscifolia, although col

1080:

of tthe sepals themselves, they are we I developed in the many the calyx. In

having

supernumerary bracteoles clustered below

Plumeria oded as

Endress et al. (1996). was a continuous row of calyeine colleters. Dele aile d examination, however, has shown that they are not homologous to typica calycine colleters in that the entire inner surface of the upper part of the sepal is glandular. Because no other taxon shares this condition in this study, it is non-informative and thus not coded here.

7. Fusion of corolla tube: O = fused just above the level of insertion; | =

stamen unfused (with gaps) just above the

evel of stamen insertion. In Apocynaceae, the lower corolla ube (composed of the united petal and stamen primordia) is congenitally fused; the upper part fuses postgenitally and basipetally, so that the last region to fuse is just above the insertion of the stamens. In some genera, flowers reach upper corolla is complete. 3 Nishino,

anthesis before hoan of ZW resulting in gaps in the corolla tube (Boke, 194€ 1982: Erbar, 1991).

\sprdosperma, Geissospermum. Haplophyton. and Jeune

These gaps are especially long in l g

tegia, resulting in consple uous slits that are easily isible

with a dissecting microscope (Woodson, 1951: Fallen. 1080

Leeuwenberg, 1997). Shorter gaps of some microns in length

(visible in microtome serial sections) are also found in

n tonta, C raspidospermum. and Hunterieae, whereas in other

genera epidermal remnants are still Wu 0 8 gh there 1 199

are no distinc gaps. In. Endress et al. ). epidermal

remnants and gaps were treated together as a 2 character state: corolla incompletely fused. Because. however, the tube may be fused yet still show epidermal remnants, here only

the presence of distinct gaps, visible with dissecting

microsc A or in serial sections, is coded as unfused.

8. rolla tube mouth: O = constricted: 1 = not cit |. Infrastaminal appendages: 0 = absen = present,

ene al appendages is a term used by P ic 2d 1948b)

for 5 of the lower, congenitally fused part of the

1 the staminal sectors (see Alvarado-Cárdenas

found mainly in tax l

Cerbera, Thevetia,

as ga

previously inch

Cerbertopsis). These genera long, thin style and

a disproportionate ‘ly large, broad style head. LO. Corolla lobe aestivation: 0 = sinistrorsely contort; | 2 = imbricate. Corolla lobe aestivation is

dextrorsely conte f the Apocynaceae. Vith a few

one most importan M. characters in

exceptions. the genus. Un Rauvolfioideae

constant within a

are almost always sinistrorsely contort, whereas in Apoc-

vnoideae. > normally dextrorsely contort or. rarely, valvate. n Aopsia, Ochrosia, and Neisosperma (all moldea. are 1 dextrorsely

2004: Middleton. 2004) and . Alstonia is one of the few genera in the

contort pen thus an

\ which both sinistrorsely as well dextrorsely contort sal occur, and this feature is constant only at the ES cles lev

. Pe e in bud: 0 = contorted petals in bud are spiraled upward

not inflexed: | = inflexed. In most

a

into a tip. I Petals that are inflexed in bud are. instead, folded downward and eer into the mouth of the corolla tube and | . Infle elatively uncommon andit in pom vnaceae.

only unfold at anthes xed petals is a

12. Gorolline corona below petal sinus; behind and/or just

above pom O = absent; | = a compact protruding lobe.

All outgrowths in the staminal sector and above the insertion

of the anther are inte 1 5 ted here as a corona. These include

the vertical ridges in Molongum Pichon, as well as the

ao rances termed casi appendages by Pichon ) ibr

(1948b) in Thevetia; the fin © lobes of Allamanda are also inte n ted as a corona (se e cde ss et al.. 1996). Ll thers: 0 =

atop filaments that arise from the corolla m sessile upon 1 staminal ridges

rails: = absent: | = present.

14. Lignified guide Lignifie 4 ane rails are a spec n of the late al parts of

the anther and have a function in the complex pollination

mechanism in VH M ee ps are absent in most

Rauvolfioideae. but are characteristic for Apocvnoideae. It

is important to note that re guide rails are also

characteristic for the majority of Tabernaemontana species (including all of the Ne ixl “al vue although absent in the Ms

all of

Leeuwenberg,

wo 's used in study and in

'epresentalive spec section Ervatamia to e h they dd (sce 1994b: xv). TI or this cha Tabernaemontana would show more affinity morphologically i resentative 199

Thus. for racter, most species of

to olongum than ds parent from the repr

species 1 ised here oa with Endress et : » in whic ho a oo val species was used in the mol!

analys

Volume 94, Number 1 007

Endress et al. 33 Phylogenetic Analysis of Alyxieae

Anther dehiscence: 0 = introrse; | = latrorse; 2 = extrorse.

16. Anther/style situated above or below, but not closely synorganized with, the style head; | nthers at about cn same level as, connivent over and in dis the s st agglutinated to the style head via is pads and adhesive.

head synorganization: anthers and e head: 2 anthers Synorganization of the anthers and the style head has always

been a key character in Apocynaceae. It is the mos! important traditional character that separates Apocynoideae (in which the anthers are postgenitally united with the style

in which the anthers are free from

head) from Rauvolfioideae the style heac

The lack of close synorganization of the anthers and style

head in Tabernaemontana divaricata is not typical of the whole genus (as defined by Leeuwenberg, 1991). In all Neotropical species of Tabernaemontana and in some

Paleotropical ones as well, the style head and anthers are more closely svnorganized and would be coded as character state l in this study.

0 =

un

H7. Style apex e cretory epithelium: 1 = style e style head with epithelium of the body uniformly

style apex without transformed into an 2 = style apex transformed into an

secretory and re live

enlarged style he ad with qe of the a vertically

differentiated with stigmatic region at base: : style apex transformed into an enlarge d style head, swith ente ‘lium of the body vertically differentiated, stigmatic zone at base. and

radially mechanically interrupted by the adnate 1 TES All

; h 1

e and manner of histological diffe -rentiation of the style head and the e pithelium is uiae. with a specific type often characteristic of a tribe (Schick, 1980; Fallen, 1986). Although the gynoecium apex in Geniostoma J. ; & C.

articular

Forst. is

irritable hairs with an abscissable lip are found scattered among the more numerous smaller, normal papillae (Endress et al., 1996). Specialized glue hairs like those found in Geniostoma are unknown in Be cae Style head upper hair wreath: 0 = absent; | = present. Some style heads have a wreath of longer hairs just below the unfused carpel tips. The main function of the wreath is for pollen deposition and secondary presentation. The flowers are protandrous; shortly before anthesis, the anthers ie and shed their pollen toward the center of the flower. If the style head has an upper wreath, the pollen is shed onto this ring of hairs, which plays a role in the complex pollination mechanism of Apocynaceae (Church, 1908: Schick, 1980: Fallen, 1986). 19. Style head pase, : = a distinct, thin collar; 2 = with a wreath of longer hairs; 3 = with thic e often equipped with a means of seraping off donor pollen from the

without collar or flange; | = with

flange. base of the style head is

proboscis of an insect visitor. The presence (or absence) and type of scraper is often of a particular tribe, and thus a useful character in 19 0 ily. When a scraper is present at the base of the located beneath it (Schick. in 20. Style head unfused apices: a = a less than 1/3 the conical and tapering to blunt and clavate, at least 1/3 the length of the total style 21. Free dise 5 0 = absent:

. the 1 7 ui zone is Fallen. 6)

inconspicuous, length of ihe ie style head; 1 = enlarged,

read.

entire, annular; M

|= = two se 17 lobes. In Apocynaceae, a free nectar dise is

often present. Sometimes the nectar dise is adnate to the base 50 ll R

of the ovary ne taxa (especially in Rauvolfioideae) are

tarless ar m appare um use deceit pollination (Haber. 1983 Lin & Bernardello, 1999). In some cases it is difficult to distinguish mx ther or not the base of the ovary is nectariferous. For this reason, only the presence versus

absence of a distinct nectary disc is coded here. : the large

genus Alstonia, this character varies from spe 0 species.

The species included in this study, A. a. 1 a shallow

disc. In some other species of Alstonia, a slight

thickening can be discerned at the base of the ovary, and in vet others there is no nee ‘ation of a nectary al all. | = 3-5-carpellate.

22. Ovary: 0 = 2-carpellate;

brush Apocynaceae a the n is composed

of two carpels. The only exceptions are found in Lepinia and

i di ac. in the Alyxieae and in Pleiocarpa in Hunterieae )

en A s et al., 1997).

“Pl acentas: 0 = lignified or indurated in fruit; 1 = not iei e or indurated in fruit. . Mesocarp consistency: 0 = fleshy, without fibers; | =

a with fibers; dry or woody.

25. Endocarp: 0 = not forming a stone around the seed: |

E ied or sclerified and forming a stone around the seed. eeds: 0 = l= funi

2 due shape: 0 = broad, compressed, not folded, mostly

= cylindrical, as if longitudinally rolled:

sessile: culate.

circular to ovoid: |

2 = narrowly fusiform, flattened, with a longitudinal fold: 3 = irregularly shaped, globular or angular, not flattened. the other

1:0 = with neither flattened e s nor wing: 2

flattened on one side only, "side con

28. Seed marg | = with a narrow clara] edge, this sometimes dissected: = with a well-developed, usually membranous wing(s); 3 = fimbriate.

29. Seed coma: 0 = absent: | = present. A coma is a tufl of hairs 7 arising from a small restricted region at the end(s) of a seed. not considered to be homologous to the fimbria that are Tee around the margin of the seed in, for example,

Alstonic

30. Hilar depressi 0 = absent: 1 = an ipa depression, less than 50% | the length of the seed: 2 = a deep, broad furrow, traversing the entire seed length: 3 =

a deep, narrow fissure, traversing 75%-80% of 1 5 E of the seed.

31. Hilum e = linear, traversing the » TEE of the

seed: | = linea ae die than the seed: = md

circular (punc im; 3 = ovate, cove nup a pod ar

with shallow.

32. Endos "sperm: not ruminate:

irregular 1 or ruminations; 2 = with deep longitudinal ruminations. Ruminate ‘oop although relatively rare in Apocynaceae, is racteristic for Taber-

naemontana and is also found in 8 genera of Alyxieae. Chilocarpus is unusual in this aspect in that the genus can be divided into two groups: those with smooth and those with 1949¢; Markgraf, 1971). The

representative species used in the analysis here be 1 Lo

ruminale endosperm (Pichon,

smooth endosperm: IM had a JEC ie S from the

Chilocarpus would fit better with

the group with other group been selected, other Alyxieae as to this character.

33. Endospe rm: 0 = tough A corneous to subcartilagi- cate, soft or mealy.

nous; 1 = firm, fleshy or starchy; 2 = de

There is consi e thickness of the endosperm. For 7 the endosperm of Alyxia, Chilo- carpus, Condylocarpon, Lepinia, Lepiniopsis, and Pteralyxia is especially thick and tough (even difficult to cut with a razor blade). In Allamanda, Picralima, Plectaneia, and Pleiocarpa. endosperm is also tough but much thinner, but because no

34

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

“thick” and “thin” could be

consistency of the sk rm is code

clear demarcation between

found, only th

nol aurict M

iculate at the base in IO

91). this was nol

7

Tabernaemontaneae (sensu encia l

alkaloit

iridoids present, indole alkaloids e nl

= Uae indole alkaloids prese nt. but only those 15 secologanin skeleton; 3 = dominant indole with rearranged secologa-

st nin skeleton of the eburnan and/or Place da type;

A = dominant indole alkaloids B nt, including those with rearranged secologanin pin of the ibogan type

36. Cardenolides: 0 = absent; | = present 37. Steroidal alkaloids 0 = absent: | esent.

= tetrad. Tetrads are rare in Rauvolfoideses ind of the taxa sampled here they oceur only in 1 arpon and Craspidospermum.

. Pollen grain: 0 small (S 51 um); 60 Average largest pollen grain size (either the length of the polar axis, P, or the diameter of the equatorial plane, E) varies between 25 and 90 um. It appears that a relatively 60 um and that only

cs large [zm

large gap exists between 51 and (56 Um) falls between. coding polle n size either as

60 Um). with one ambiguous

Inechites small (= 5 case, gives two rather we e separated size classes

um) or as large (=

40. Pollen grain shape: O = regular; | = irregular. Pollen

grains with a regular quie have a * rlurale ape rlure f h i

apertures that are unequally spaced and sized and have an oblique orientation. Irregular pollen grains with three porate apertures have unequally spaced and sized apertures with oblique orientations.

= one or two; 2 = three

41. Aperture number: 0 = zero: |

or four; 3 five or more. In Rauvolfioideae, only Condylocarpon has inaperturate pollen (aperture number = Two- e pollen (sometimes mixed with l-

1 Chilocarpus, Plectaneta, and eS a

within a single sample) is found in most other genera. A few

zero). l-aperturate pollen (often mixed genera NE, ive or more apertures (up to 10 apertures are found in Craspidospermum). In most samples studied, minor percentages of polle n grains with deviating aperture numbers are found, which is a common phenomenon in dicots. The coding given is for the dominant 1 numbers.

42. E cloape rtures: 0 = long colpi; ! = 5 E

r than ca.

large port; 3 = small po

ectoapertures are either longe 2/3 (long colpi) or shorter than ca. 1/3 (short ado) the length of the polar axis (P). Large least 6 Um: if 6 Um (Chilocarpus, Plectaneta), then they are always accompanied by larger pori (up to 9 and 12 um, respectively) in the same E n grain. size in

pori are al

Small pores are 2-5 Um and do not vary much i

a single grain. Due to its thin outer exine, Vinca 0 has

indistinct ecloapertures.

43. Ee cloaperture margin: 0 = P pid: thickened: akly ardly distinc ly

= outwardly thickened; 3 = ectoaperture margin is usually not thickened. In genera Dun

ickened:

viti: conspicuous aret ns ridge

S

arge pores, but also in the brac hycolpate Molongum. it i distinctly thickened into a well-de limite d, protruding margin

(aspidate pollen). In the genera with small pores, the I | 8 |

ecloaperture margin is nol or only weakly thic kened.

\spidosperma and Vallesia have conspicuous ridges (massive respectively) along the colpi joining

9 partly hollow,

toward the poles.

14. Endoapertures: 0 = distinct from and smaller than ecloapertures: = not distinct from ecloapertures; 2 = distinct from and larger tl ectoapertures. ! xia, Lepinia, Lepiniopsis, Plectaneta, and Pteralyxia (all with

porate polle n), the e ndoape rtures are nol delimited from the ectoapertures (e ndo- and e cloapertures congruent). ra. the endopore is distinct by being situated in in all other taxa

porate gent a differentiated inner exine laye the endo- and ectoapertures are incongruent. In colporate

er, and also 1

pollen grains, the endoapertures are E ways smaller than vo which the endoa- the

the ectoapertures, except in Vinca,

pertures (delimited by costae) are larger than V

. Endoaperture margin: : 0 = = nol inwardly bus kened:

ings at the 1 1 8 of circular to lalongate endoaper- lures.

16. ve mentary endocolpi: 0 = absent (no endoplates recognizable weak (zones P endocracks: endoplates indistinct): = Supplementary endocolpi are narrow (e.g.. Cabucula) to wide

distinct (endoplates well recognizable)

(e.g... Rhazya) zones along the colpi (one at each side) where

the inner exine layer is more or less missing. They may join interaperturally toward the poles. In some genera (e.g. Catharanthus). they seem to have taken over at least some of

the function of the ectocolpi, bordering on distinctly thicker X

intine parts (see El-Ghazaly. 1990, fig. 17). Usually.

supple mentary e pt have a granular inner surface and

smooth

fea T a

7. Intine A 0 = absent; present. Coding of argely based on data provided by Pichon

1950a. b)

ae charac ter is

Protruding intine bulges at o O

intricately channe led structure. In Alyxia, there s to be a kind of relatively rigid operculum topping the protrusion (Huang. 1986).

Exine: O = (thin). Condylocarpon and Vinca have a thin exine (0.1—0.6 um and ca. 0.1 Um. respectively), whereas in the other genera, exine thickness is at least 0.9 um, but is usually much

reduced reduced

nol

48

thicker. male;

¿0 = psilate; | = 2 or the inner

This c 1 ‘ter m

49. Inner exine surface

verrucale: 3 = granular. ornamentation of the exine (nexine surface) and was taken from scabrate surface has elements smaller than | um. Verrucate and granular elements are larger than 1 um, the former with

the inside of the mesocolpia (mesoporia) centers. A

a broad base, the latter with a constricted base.

50. Inner exine layer 1 O = inous (foot. layer/endexine); | = ect = endexinous (foot layer absent).

ectexinous/endex- xxinous (endex This character

xine absent): 2 codes for the composition of the inner exine layer (nexine).

Volume 94, Number 1 2007

Endress et al. 35 Phylogenetic Analysis of Alyxieae

a lamellate de

Endexinous parts are indicated by e lines; . Ectexinous parts

structure and/or a + spongy oe

homogeneous. Usually endexinous and ectexinous parts is in contrast. nfratectum: 0 = columellate: J = granular, reticulate or a gular: = not recognizable (commissural line). |

RP NUN s e is found only in Gelsemium. In most other genera, the infratectum is granular, and varying in thickness. In Alyxia, Lepinia,

Pieralyxia, an indis-

reticulate

or irregular, infratectum is

Lepiniopsis, and i the contact be-

tinct (sparse gaps in inner exine layer), tween ectexine and endexine being largely a commissural

line. 52. Tectum: O = thicker than infratectum + inner exine layer; 1 = equal to infratectum + inner exine layer; 2 =

thinner than infratectum + inner exine layer. This character codes for the thickness of the tectum ene with the rest of the exine (infratectum + inner exine layer). It is also an position of the

When

approximate measure for the relative infratectum. Usually the tectum is well delimited.

the boundary is irregular (e.g., in Plectaneia), the average

tectum thickness was measured. Outer exine surface: 0 = psilate (even to undulate `); with angular

srrucale, anastomosing verrucae; 4 =

verrucate, with + circular isolated verrucae: 3 = micro- reticulate; 4 = seabrate; 5 = _ striate-reticulate. This character codes for the outer ornamentation of the exine (tectum surface). Most genera have psilate pollen (no

protube rances), with an even to undulate, often perforate surface. Lepinia and Lepiniopsis have verrucate pollen with anastomosing verrucae. The other states, except for scabrate exine, occur in single genera.

. Mesoc pump ium centers surrour adie exi

0 = outer bus e = outer

hardly or not deviating from ne surface cle arly de >V ed from surrounding exine. cn about 1/ 4 of the sampled genera with colporate polle n, the outer n es of the mesocolpium centers have a different ornamentation compared with the 3 areas. Usually microfossulate to

the mesocolpium centers have a rugulate,

verrucate, or a less distinctly perforate ornamentation.

PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS Livia Wanntorp?? and Paul I. Forster! BETWEEN HOYA AND THE

MONOTYPIC GENERA MADANGIA,

ABSOLMSIA, AND MICHOLITZIA

(APOCYNACEAE,

MARSDENIEAE): INSIGHTS FROM

FLOWER MORPHOLOGY'

ABSTRACT

The e genera Absolmsia Kuntze, Madangia P. I. Forst, Liddle & I. Addle, and V 5 zia N. E. Br. (Apocynaceae, 9 85 nieae) are, according to molecular phylogenetic results, nested a in the genus Hoya R. Br. a with Dischidia R. Br., these genera are considered to e omprise a well-supported clade within the tribe Va mieae. Flower

dpi of a Madangia, and Micholitzia is examined by SEM and light microscopy and compared to that of the related H. caudata Wook. f., H. curtisii King Gamble, H. lc Schltr., H. lacunosa Blume, H. ao Schltr., H. retusa Dalzell, and H. venusta Schltr. We discuss the Morpholngic val evidence that supports the reduction of these genera into Hoya

Among characters supporting such a position is the presence of : Sh id margin on the pollinia of Absolmsta, Madangia., Micholitzia, and Hoya that is absent on the pollinia of Dischidia. 9 and Madangia vem a staminal corona with outer er lobes, similar to that of Hoya. While the outer corona processes of Absolmsta nd Micholitzia are free and revolute,

as In most species of Hoya, those of Madangia are laterally fused forming a continuous skirt resembling the corona of certain species of Hoya. The flowers of Micholitzia are superfic ial similar to those of Dischidia in its urceolate corolla, but the

sli E corona with revolute outer processes dec idedly links Micholitzia to Hoya. The new combination M. inflata (P. J. N.

Forst, Liddle & I. M. Liddle) L. Wanntorp & P. I. Forst. is proposed. For Micholitzia obcordata E. Br., the name A. yuennanensis Hand.-Mazz. has nomenclatural bs and should therefore P ised when including M. obcordata in Hoya. ey words: Absolmála, Apocynaceae, corolla, corona, Dischidia, Hoya, Madangia, Marsdenieae, Micholitzia, morpho-

logy, pellucid margin, phylogeny, pollinaria, pollinia.

The tribe Marsdenieae Bentham (1868) (Apocyna- these studies, leaving several relationships within the ceae, Asclepiadoideae) is thought to include 29 Marsdenieae unresolved. genera and over 570 species distributed in the New One of the genera in the Marsdenieae whose and the Old Worlds (Omlor, 1998). The taxonomic taxonomic delimitations remain unclear is Hoya, the positions of the genera Cionura Griseb., Dregea E. wax plants ofo ornamental horticulture, a large tropical

Mey., Dischidia R. Br., Gymnema R. Br., Hoya R. Br., genus of over 300 herbaceous to succulent species of Marsdenia R. Br., Micholitzia N. E. Br., Rhyssolobium Which about 40 are commonly found in cultivation E. Mey., Stephanotis Thou., and Telosma Coville have (Forster et al., 1998, 1999, 2002), although many been examined in previous morphological and more are cultivated in specialist collections. Species molecular phylogenetic studies (Liede & Albers, of Hoya are distributed from mainland Asia (China, 1994; Forster, 1995; Endress & Bruyns, 2000; India, Vietnam. Burma, Laos, Cambodia) through Potgieter & Albert, 2001; Sennblad & Bremer, Malaysia, Indonesia, and New Guinea to Australia and 2002; Rapini et al., 2003; Livshultz, 2003; Meve the western Pacific islands (Forster & Liddle, 1996). Liede, 2004; Wanntorp et al., 2006a). However, only Most species of Hoya are laticiferous wiry climbers,

a few species of each of these genera were included in often epiphytic, with fleshy to succulent leaves of

We thank Prof. S. S. Renner (Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich) for supporting the laboratory work of this study: Bostróm, €. Forsberg-Heikkilá, D. J. Liddle, and T. Nyhuus for sharing flower material: E. Facher, M. Vosyka, and A. Kocyan (Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich) for laboratory assistance; and D. Goyder (Royal Botanic Gardens. Kew) for kind help

with the herbarium specimen of Hoya spartioides. This paper is part of a research project by the first author supported by the

Swedish Research Council.

Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Institute of Systematic Botany, Menzinger Strasse 67 D-80638 Munie h, ES rmany. 0

: dress: Department of Botany, Stockholm University, Lilla Frescativ. 10691

Correspondence and current a Stockholm, Swedenlivia.wanntorpObotan.su.se.

"Queensland Herbarium, Environmental Protection Ageney, Brisbane Botanic Gardens, Mt. Coot-tha Road, Toowong Qld 4066, Australia.

ANN. Missouri Bor. GARD. 94: 36-55. PUBLISHED ON 26 APRIL 2007.

Volume 94, Number 1

Wanntorp & Forster Phylogenetic Relationships of Hoya

various size, color, and venation. A minority of species are non-climbing and with foliage that is either erect or pendent. The sympetalous flowers are clustered in umbelliform extra-axillary inflorescences mostly with perennial peduncles ( 1998). The complex, fleshy flowers of Hoya comprise a pentamer- ous corolla that is highly variable in shape, color, and

dimensions; a staminal corona with inner processes

Forster et a

..

adnate to the anther connective and outer processes with revolute lobes; a gynostegium, standing on a short or long column above the corolla and including five

fused anthers, the ovaries, and the style head (Forster

et al., 1998); and two pollinia from adjacent anthers, united by a translator apparatus secreted. from the

style head to a pollinarium (Omlor, 1998; Kleijn & van Donkelaar, 2001).

A morphological revision of the Marsdenieae placed Hoya, Dischidia, and the "EU. genera Absolmsia Kuntze, Madangia P. I. , Liddle & I. M. Liddle, and Micholitzia 1 in a 1 sharing an epiphytic habit, fleshy to succulent leaves (in Absolmsia only present at an early age stage), generally persistent extra-axillary inflorescences, and comose and fusiform seeds without prominent wings but with keel-shaped thickenings on the seed coats (Omlor, 1998; Livshultz, 2003). In addition to Omlor's work, a possible close relationship between Micho- litzia, Madangia, Absolmsia, and Hoya was discussed in morphological papers specific to each of these genera (Goyder & Kent, 1994; Forster et al., 1997; Kloppenburg, 2001). While the first two of these studies discussed the similarity of Madangia inflata P. I. Forst, Liddle I. M. Liddle and Micholitzia obcordata N. E. Br. to Hoya without taking position egarding the relationship of these species to Hoya, Kloppenburg (2001) concluded that A. spartioides Kuntze should be included in Hoya based on its morphological similarities in the corolla and corona. Kloppenburg therefore proposed a change of name for the single species of Absolmsia to H. spartioides (Benth.) Kloppenb. None of these studies, however, examined relationships using a phylogenetic ap- Another species has been referred to the This taxon

0

proach. genus Absolmsta, namely was, however, recently shown to belong to the genus Tylophora R. Br. (Gil 1995).

Recently, two molecular phylogenetic studies based on chloroplast gene regions of the m intron, trnL- trnF spacer, and atpB-rbcL spacer, as well as on nuclear sequences of the ribosomal ITS region, were conducted to examine the phylogeny of Hoya and its taxonomic delimitation (Wanntorp et al., 2006a, b). three species of Dis- Madangia inflata, and together with

oligophylla. I

vert et al.,

Thirty-five species of Hoya, chidia, Absolmsia spartioides, Micholitzia obcordata were analyzed,

species representing subfamilies Periplocoideae and Secamonoideae, as well as tribes Fockeae, Marsde- nieae, Ceropegieae, and Asclepiadeae (sensu Endress & Stevens, 2001; 2003). A major result of these studies was that Hoya is paraphyletic without the inclusion. of the Absolmsia, Madangia, and Micholitzia, which are all found clearly nested among the 35 species of Hoya examined ( 2006a, b).

The aim of the present study is to examine the flower morphology of Absolmsia spartioides, Madangia inflata, Micholitzia obcordata, of closely related species of Hoya by using light and SEM microscopy. We discuss which morphological

characters bear on the phylogenetic and taxonomic

Verhoeven et al.,

monotypic genera

Wanntorp et al.,

and a selection

positions of these genera within Hoya.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We examined the floral morphology of the species Hoya caudata Hook. f. H. hypolasia Schltr., H. H. retusa Dalzell,

5

Absolmsia spartioides, curtisii King Gamble, lacunosa Blume, H. patella Schltr.,

H. venusta Schltr., Madangia inflata, and Micholitzia

obcordata. Flower material at anthesis was collected and stored in 70% ethanol at the Botanical De- partment of Stockholm University, except for the

material of Madangia inflata provided by D. J. Liddle (Queensland, Australia), of Absolmsia spartioides by T. Nyhuus (Järfälla, Sweden), of H. curtisii by A. Boström Stockholm, Sweden), and of H. hypolasia and H. venusta by C. Forsberg-Heikkilä (Porvoo, Finland). The identity of all species examined was confirmed with the literature or by comparison with original type reports voucher information for the

* Ae

material. Table specimens examined.

SEM and light microscopic studies were performed on all species mentioned above with the exception of Hoya hypolasia and H. venusta, which were only examined by SEM microscopy, due to scarce material. For SEM microscopy, all flowers were dehydrated in an alcohol-acetone series, critical-point dried, and sputter-coated with gold. SEM microscopy was done with a LEO 438 VP scanning electron microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) at the Department of System- atic Botany, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich. For sectioning, microtome sections were made using 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate embedding (Igersheim & Cichocki, 1996), cut at 10 um, and stained with toluidine blue and ruthenium red. When discussing the morphology of a single corona lobe, we use the term corona lobe, while we define the inner and outer parts of each lobe by using the terms inner (ip) and

outer (op) processes, respectively.

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Table 1.

Herbariorum (Holmgren et al., 1990).

Voucher information on the specimens used

the present study. Herbarium. abbreviations. follow Index

Species

Voucher information

Vosolmsia spartioides Kuntze

Hoya caudata Hook. f.

Hoya curtisii King & Gamble Hoya hypolasta Schltr.

Hoya lacunosa Blume Hoya patella Schltr. Hoya retusa Dalzell

Hoya venusta Schltr

Madangia inflata P. V. Forst., Liddle & J. M. Liddle

Micholitzia obcordata N. E. Br

592 (5), Sipitang, Borneo

593 (S), ex hort. Department of Botany, Stockholm University

597 (S). 594 (S) 571 (S), Stoc kholm University

Wanntorp L. Wanntorp L. Wanntorp L. ex hort. Wanntorp L. y ex hort. Wanntorp L. ex hort. Department of Botany, Wanntorp L. 575 (S), ex hort. Department of Botany, EM niversity

380 (8). 1998-3127, Rosendal Uppsala,

Ippsala pups al Garden

Wanntorp L.

; 1 L. 595 (S), ex hort. ). J. Liddle 75 1076 (BRI), Madang Province, 596 (S), ex hort.

New Guinea

l anntorp L.

ResULTS

1. Hoya spartioides (Benth.) Kloppenb., Fraterna 14: 8. 2001. Basionym: Benth. in Hook., le. Pl. spartioides (Benth.) Kuntze, as 418. 1891. TYPE: 4 Burbidge s.n. fl). 2 of 2 (t)] not

Astrostemma spartioides 1880. Absolmsia “spartoides,” [Malaysia]. (lectotype,

Revis. Gen. PI. 2: North

designated here, K [1 of 2 (

Borneo,

seen).

Hoya spartioides is an epiphytic, sparsely branched, non-twining subshrub with fleshy leaves from Borneo. Inflorescences pedunculate, comprising concave um- bels with 4

6 flowers; pedicels ca. 1 mm long,

glabrous, rough. Calyx lobes obtuse-triangular, ca.

0.02 0.02 mm. Corolla shortly campanulate to salver-shaped, orange-yellow, glabrous, ca. 10 mm diam., with 5 triangular oval lobes, ca. 3 X 3 mm (Fig. 1760 Gynostegium on a short hairy column (Fig. IC). Corona flat, star-shaped, white, smooth,

covered by thick hairs on the upright part (Fig. LA—C,

Harrow,

L

E, G); inner processes of lobes spathulate,

appressed to the anther appendages (Fig. 1D); outer

lobes with deeply revolute processes (Fig. 1D, E);

anther appendages lanceolate-acute, approximately as long as the corona lobes (Fig. IF. C); style head flat

(Fig. 1H).

nected by thickened winged caudicles to a corpuscu-

Pollinarium consisting of 2 pollinia con- lum: pollinia square in outline, almost as long as wide. ca. 0.3 X 0.2 mm (Fig. 2E, G, H), the pellucid margin very wide but covering only ca. 1/3 of the dorsal margin of the pollinia (Fig. 2H); corpusculum thick, * 0.2 2 long, spreading appendages, upper part enclosing X 0.1 mm (Fig. 2F

almost round in shape, ca. 0.2 mm, ending with

the caudicles, ca. 0.2

The herbarium specimen chosen as lectotype for Hoya spartioides was selected among the collections available for this plant at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (D. Goyder, pers. comm., 2007)

Brit. Ind.

“Malacca,”

H10): 60. Maingay

2. Hoya caudata Hook. f., Fl. 1883. TYPE: 1128 (holotype, K not seen).

| Malaysia].

Hoya caudata is an epiphytic twiner with leathery- fleshy leaves from the Malay Peninsula and Thailand.

Inflorescences pedunculate, comprising | geotropic,

concave umbels, with up to 12 pendent flowers:

pedicels longer in the periphery of the inflorescence

and shorter in its middle, 2-3 em long, hirsute. Calyx

lobes linear-lanceolate, ca. 2 X ca. 1 mm, glabrous.

Corolla flattened-campanulate, pink-yellow, inside

o»ubescent in the middle, with long caudate hairs al | 8 lobes ovate-

the margins (Fig. 3A, B), ca. 2 em diam.:

triangular, acute-cuspidate, 4-7 X 4-5 mm (Fig. 3A). Fig. 3A).

Corona with a dark red ring in the middle but lighter

Gynostegium stalked on a short column

at the margins, smooth; inner processes slightly

B

»nnüng up (Fig. 3C); outer processes very wide, } o o / | J

bending upward, not deeply revolute (Fig. 3C); anther and whip-like, very much ex-

3B—D); style head long-

apiculate (Fig. 3D). Pollinarium comprising 2

appendages slender ceeding the corona lobes (Fig. pollinia connected by broadly winged and flattened caudicles to a corpusculum (Fig. 3E); pollinia longer than wide, cylindrical-elongate, ca. 08 X 0.2 mm; pellucid margin covering the dorsal margin of the pollinia; corpusculum. narrow-rhomboid, ca. 0.2 0.1 mm, ending with 2 long, spreading appendages (Fig. JF); caudicles ca. 0.1 X 0.1 mm (Fig. 3E).

Wanntorp & Forster 39

Volume 94, Number 1 Phylogenetic Relationships of Hoya

2007

Hoya a —A. B. on views of flowers showing remains of the corolla (el), corona (co), guide rail (gr). Side view of flower l (c pm . Details of coronas showing inner processes (ip aa). and Mn ulum (cq "n 1 il sec oy of f lowe T E. the postca and UNE appendages (aa . Detail of flower (top view) with Light mic eh section (longitudinal view)

= | mm (A, C), 4 mm (B), 100 um (F, H

Figure !. and aa ulum (cp). ouler processes (op), Ear 'r appe ndages { of inner corona processes (ip), guide rail (gr), Ae us corona (co) with hairs (h), anther appendages (aa), : of flower showing the style head (st) and part of s corpusculum (cp). Scale ER

200 um (E). 300 um (D, C).

orpusculum (cp).

=>

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

SS US o EX

XQ N

(AN

. pollinia and

anther append: wes (ad).

Hoya inflata. —A. Upper part of flower seen from above with inner (ip) and outer (op) corona proce showing the pos sitions of coronas (co).

(ca). and pollinia (po) with > ue id margins (pe) and one

l . Side view of pollinaria

E Pollinarium seen from

re 2. B. Gross section of flower D. Pollinaria with corpusculum ( cp). caudicle D). Hoya spartioides. —F. I ged caudicles. —H. Pollinia (po) with

(B). 100 Um (C.

Figu

(po). and St tyle ies (sl).

pollinia (po). —C. D.

anther appe om ge (aa). Scale bars = 1 mm (A). 4 mm

formed by the corpuscula (ep), the caudicles (ca), and the pollinia ( | (po) with pe Nue id margin (pe). \rrows denote long appendages from the corpusculum partly covering the

bread: pellucid margin (pe) and caudicles (ea). Seale bars = 30 um (F-H), 100 155 (E)

be low

Volume 94, Number 1 Wanntorp & Forster 41 2007 Phylogenetic Relationships of Hoya

ir Raa ate Figure 3. Hoya caudata. —A, B. F lowers showing remains of corolla (cl) D 80 (h), corona (co) with inner (ip) and ouler (op) processes on a column (c 10 anther appendages (aa). and style head (s . Detail of flower showing 1 0 ri ails (gr). —D. Upper part of flower with anther appendages (aa). style head (st), and im (po) with falcate caudicles (ca). Details of a pollinarium: pollinia (po), caudicles (ca), and corpusculum (cp). —F. Detail of flower showing the rM 5

guide rails (gr), corpusculum (ep), and style head (st). Seale bars = 1 mm (A-C), 200 um 100 30 um (E). 100 um (F).

Asiat. Soc. narrowly triangular, ca. 2 X | mm. Corolla rotate,

3. Hoya curtisii King & Gamble, | Bengal, Pt. 2, Nat. Hist. 742): 563. 1907. TYPE: creamy white, inside completely pubescent, except on Malay Peninsula, Curtis 2894 (holotype, SING!). the margins, ca. 0.7 mm diam. (Fig. 4A); lobes

oblong- oblanceolate, acute at the lips, reflexed,

Hoya curtisii is an epiphyte with non-twining 7 X 4mm. Gynostegium borne on an annular

pendent stems and succulent leaves from the Malay structure (annulus) on a high column (Fig. 4A, B,

me

Peninsula. Inflorescences pedunculate, comprising D). Corona red in the middle and white at the margins: convex, globose umbels with up to 30 flowers; lobes sulcate, with a central depression or an umbo

pedicels ea. 22 mm long, densely hairy. Calyx lobes (Fig. 4A); inner processes blunt (Fig. 4E); outer

45 Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

` yr Je 5

Figure 4. Hoya curtisii. —A. D. Flowers with calyx (ex). Ea ui corona (co) with inner ed (op) processes, annulus (an), guide i (

s (gr). tyle ena . and pollinia (po). B. ¿nlarge ment * E position f the annulus (an). Part of f Mos Y bonne ini rails (gr), corpusculum (cp). 2 style head (s -E. Single coron 85 lying on annulus (an) with inner (ip) and outer 1 9 processes 7. Part of flower showing coronas (co), ed rails (gr), “pollini 1 (po), and style head (st). Scale bars = (A, B), 2 2n mm (D), 100 um (C), 300 um (E, F

processes made of 3 parts, of which 2 wide and bent lum ca. 1 X 0.3 mm, ending with 2 long. spread- against each other, and the third part bending upon ing appendages: caudicles ca. 0.1 X 0.04 mm these 2 and touching them (Fig. 4E): anther appen- (Fig. SA, D). | Pl 8 dages lanceolate, blunt, exe 'eeding the corona lobes "ig. OC); style head flat (Figs. F, 5 ollinar- (Fig. 5€); style head flat (Figs. 4C, F, 5C). Polli

2 MH 4. dn a Schltr., Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 50: 123. ium comprising 2 pollinia attached by flattened and

1913. TYPE: New Guinea. R. Schlechter 18075

winged caudicles to a corpusculum: pollinia spindle- e r ] l | mes vom B not seen

shaped, much longer than wide, ca. 10 X 0.3 mm (Figs. dF. 5A, B. D): pellucid margin covering 1/2 of Hoya hypolasia is an epiphytic twiner with fleshy

the dorsal margin of the pollinia (Fig. 5D): corpuscu- leaves from New Guinea. Inflorescences pedunculate.

Volume 94, Number 1 2007

Wanntorp & Forster 43

Phylogenetic Relationships of Hoya

H

" * * id Ex ^ da LE à ^ afe es r

Figure 5.

Cross section). showing inner (ip) and outer (op) corona (co) p T | mm (C), 2 mm (B), 100

corpusculum (cp), winged caudicles (ca), and pollinia (po) with pellucid margins (pe).

jars =

and style head (st). Scale

Hoya curtisii. —A, D. Pollinaria with pollinia (po), corpuscula (cp). and caudicles (ca). n

—B, C. Flowers (B. ocesses, anther appendages (aa). guide rails (gr), pollinia (po um (D), 200 um (A). Hoya lacunosa —E. Pollinarium with -F. Detail of a pollinarium with

corpusculum (ep) and part of caudicles (ca). Scale bars = 10 um (F), 100 um (E).

comprising concave umbels of ca. 10 flowers, ca. 2 cm diam.; pedicels ca. 40 mm long, glabrous. Calyx lobes obtuse, ca. 0.1 X 0.1 mm. Corolla flattened-campan- ulate, creamy white, outside glabrous, inside hairy, ca. 1.5 em diam. (Fig. 6A, B, D); lobes ovate-triangular, ca. 0.8 X 0.6 mm. Inner processes of corona lobe very short and obtuse (Fig. 6F, H), not covering the anther appendages and the style head (Fig. 6C); outer processes revolute (Fig. 6F, H); anther appendages lobes

lanceolate, acute, exceeding the corona

(Fig. 6F); style head flat (Fig. 6C, D). Pollinarium

comprising 2 pollinia attached by broadly winged and flattened caudicles to a corpusculum; pollinia oblong- elongate, basal part protruding outward, ca. 0

0.3 mm (Fig. 6E, G); pellucid margin covering the entire dorsal margin (Fig. 6G); corpusculum ca. 0.2 X ] mm, ending with 2 short appendages (Fig. 6G): caudicles very short, ca. 0.1 X 0.03 mm (Fig. 6E, C).

5. Hoya lacunosa Blume, Bijdr. Fl. Ned. Ind. 16: 1063. 1826. (Blume)

Otostemma lacunosum

44

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

—D. Parts of flowers seen from s (aa), pollinia

0).

») processes, guide ra uls (gr). an ithe zd B en idage

Figure 6. Hoya hypolasia. . Flower from side showing corollas (el) and corona (c above with corolla (cl). inner T ane Pollinaria with num (po). es scula (cp). caudi single corona lobe ee inner (ip) outer (op) processes, anth

d outer op) corona (c

(5 , cles (ca), and dpud Apo) i pe ‘lucid margins (pe). —F, 170 a views of : T appendages (aa and pollinia (po). Se ale bars = 1 mm (A-D), 0 um (E

and stvle head

300 um (F,

Volume 94, Number 1 2007

Wanntorp & Forster Phylogenetic Relationships of Hoya

Indone-

Blume in Rumphia 4: 30. 1849. TYPE: Horsfield s.n. (holotype, K not seen

sla. Hoya lacunosa is a twiner from Thailand and the Malay

prising pendent, convex umbels, with up to 30 flowers.

Peninsula. Inflorescences pedunculate, com-

^

'a. 5 mm diam.; pedicels of outer flowers longer than

10-20 mm long, elabrous.

central ones, g.g Calvx lobes

triangular, ca. 1 X 0.5 mm. Corolla rotate, white, ca 5 mm diam.: lobes lanceolate, acute-cuspidate. totally reflexed giving the flower a globose shape. very hairy. X 2 mm (Fig. 7A). uous column (Fig. 7G). Corona lobes elliptical. basal

ca. 4 Gynostegium on a conspic-

part forming a continuous structure looking like a skirt

(Fig. 7B. D. F. C): inner processes acutely ascending.

outer processes obtuse, slightly ascending (Fig. 7A— F); be appendages lanceolate, acute, exceeding

the corona lobes (Fig. 7F); style head shortly apiculate (Fig. 7E, H). Pollinarium

attached by broadly winged and flattened

comprising 2 pollinia caudicles

to a corpusculum; pollinia elongate-falcate. ca. 0.4 X

0.1 mm (Fig. 5E); corpusculum ca. 0.1 X 0.1 mm. ending with 2 short appendages (Fig. 5E, F); caudicles thick, broadly winged, 0.1 X 0.1 mm (Fig. 5E).

6. Hoya inflata (P. I. Forst, Liddle & I. M. Liddle) L. Wanntorp & P. I. Forst., comb. nov. Basionym: Madangia inflata P. Forst., Liddle I. M.

Liddle. Austrobaileya 5: 54. 1997. TYPE: Papua

New Guinea. Madang A ince: Headwaters Dom

River, 20 Nov. 1995, M. Liddle IMLIO76 (holotype. BRI!). Hoya inflata is an epiphytic twiner with fleshy

leaves from New Guinea. Inflorescences pedunculate, to 9

flowers. ca. | X ca. 2 em; pedicels sparsely hirsute,

comprising pendent, convex umbel, with up

30-45 mm long. Calyx lobes triangular, ca. 1 2 mm. Corolla urceolate-globose, fleshy, creamy

calyx (Fig. 8D), glabrous basal inside part covered by long, ca. | X 2 em (Fig.

reflexed, ca.

white, basally hiding the on the outside, 3A); lobes X mm.

columnar

slender, woolly hairs,

triangular, somewhat

Gynostegium on a conspicuous hairy continuous

skirt,

structure (Fig. BA). Corona made of

lobes forming a membranous smooth whose lower part builds up a continuous rim that is bent inward (Fig. 8A, C-E). white: lobes free at the style head (Figs. 8E, acute, protruding above the corona lobes (Fig. 8B, E); style head flat (Fig. 8B, F,

2 pollinia connected by unwinged and flattened

F, 2A); anther appendages lanceolate,

G). Pollinarium comprising

caudicles to a corpusculum; pollinia with oblong- round apical part, c: X 0.3 mm (Figs. 8G, 21

D); pellucid margin covering the entire dorsal margin

of the pollinia and slightly protruding outward at the corpusculum oblong-ovate, ca. 0.4 X D): 0.1 X 0.7 mm

basal part; 0.2 mm (Fig. 2C. (Fig. 2C).

caudicles ca

Hoya yuennanensis Hand.-Mazz.. Symb. Sin. 7(4): 1001. 1936. TYPE: China. Yunnan: betw. Ota-Tanschan & Tsedjrong. 4 Oct. 1915. Han-

del-Mazzetti 7971 (holotype. W not seen).

iano tna obcordata N. E. Br., Bull. Misc. Inform. . 1909. Syn. nov., non Hoya obcordata

s = Fl. Brit. India 4: 56. 885 . Dischidia obcordata (N. E. Br.) J. F. Maxwell & R. van Donkelaar, Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam. Soc. 39: 78. 1991. TYPE: *India & Burma." cult. Roval Bot. Gard. Glasnevin, Dublin, 1909, Micholitz s.n.

(holotype, K not seen).

Hoya lantsangensis Tsiang & P. T. Li, Acta Phytotax. Sin. 12: 126. 1974. SP nov. Antiostelma lantsangense (Tsiang & P. T. Li) P. T. La, Novon 2: 218. 1992. TYPE: China. Yunnan: Mo-Jiang, Talang, A. Henry 13589 [cited by Tsiang & P. T.

Li as A. Henry 13689] (holotype, NY not seen: isotypes, IBSC not seen, K not seen). Hoya manipurensis Deb, J. Indian Bot. Soc. 34: 50.

955. Antiostelma manipurense (Deb) P. T. Li. Novon 2: 219. 1992. TYPE: India. Manipur: Litan, 1 Sep. 1953, D. B. Deb 1081 (holotype.

CAL not seen).

Hoya yuennanensis is an epiphytic vine with fleshy

leaves from China (Yunnan). India. Burma, and

Thailand. Inflorescences pedunculate. comprising

racemes of up to 7 flowers, ca. 1.4 ca. 0.8 mm;

pedicels ca. 2 mm long, hirsute. Calyx lobes obtuse-

triangular, ca. 0.2 0.3 mm, slightly pubescent.

Corolla narrowly urceolate, greenish with reddish lobular margins uniformly densely pilose on the outside: tube wider at the base and gradually

narrowing up to the rim, inside covered by uniformly 1.2 X 0.6 mm (Fig. 9A):

densely

distributed long hairs. ca. lobes triangular, slightly reflexed. x 0.1 mm (Fig. 9A).

fleshy sulcate lobes, white; inner processes short and

inside

pilose, ca. 0. Corona with 5

Fig. 9C); outer processes with

slightly bent upward a deep groove (Fig. 9C, D); anther appendages much exceeding the corona lobes and ending with a tri- angular structure that (Fig. 9A—C, E); style head short, conical. Pollinarium comprising 2 pollinia connected by flattened, un-

touches the style head

winged caudicles to a corpusculum; pollinia lying in an almost horizontal position in regard to the corona, 0.2 mm (Fig. OF, G); pellucid margin covering the entire dorsal margin of

the pollinia (Fig. 9F, G):

almost squared, ca.

corpusculum rhomboid, c:

46 Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

quei LP, M z., A

fact d aN

SA isles

+ J^ [

gum 8

Figure 7. Hoya lacunosa. —A. Flower with corolla (el) and inner (ip) and outer (op) corona (co) proce D.

2I Different views of coronas with inner un and outer (op) processes, anther ¿ appendages (aa). and guide rails (gr). pus shows the fused outer corona processes. —E. Section of flower showing pollinia (po) and style head (st). —F. Single corona with inner (ip) and outer (op) paa and adnate xd appe ndi age (aa). Arrow shows the fused outer corona processe G. ( F | (cm). H. Cross section of flower 1 8 guide rails (gr). corpuse ulum (cp). E

head (st). Scale bars = 1 mm (A), LOO um (400. 20 200 um (F), 300 um (B-E,

Volume 94, Number 1 2007

Wanntorp & Forster Phylogenetic Relationships of Hoya

Figure 8. Hoya inflata. —A. and outer (op) corona (c ʻo) proces and style heac

3

st).

inner (1p) ) and outer (op) corona proce (cp). Arrow in E

s, column (cm), and pollinia (po).

sses, euide rails

shows the fused processes of the corona. Scale ba

ower showing the remainder of the corolla (cl) with hairs (h), corona (co) with inner (ip

pper part of flowers with anther appendages Flower seen from side with corona (co) and TA rest of corolla (cl) with hairs (h). —D. Fl from below with the rem: 11 of the corolla (cl) and corona process

| mm (A, C-).

(aa)

. Flower seen s bent inward. —E-G. her appe Dus 5

per part of flowers showing aa), pollinia (bol silo head (st)

JA un ec Mc

100 mm (B, G).

48 Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

N

fr YR fh f

Figure O. Hoya yuennanensis. . D. Longitudinally sectioned flowe isi Ones el) A hairs (h). corona (co) with revolute outer. processes (op). guide r is (gr), and anther appendages (aa). pper par of flower with inner corona processes (ip), revolute outer processes (op), anther appendages (aa), and pollini 1 (po). "m: . Pollinaria with equa (cp). ie les (ca), and pollinia (no) with pellue idn margins (pe). Scale bars mm (A). 4 mm ps 30 um (C). 100 um (E. F), 200 um (B, C).

Volume 94, Number 1 2007

Wanntorp 4 Forster 49 Phylogenetic Relationships of Hoya

0.1 X 0.08 mm, appendages (Fig. 9F, C).

(Fig. OF, G).

with 2 short and straight Caudicles ca. 0.1 X 0.1 mm

ending

8. Hoya patella Schltr., Bot. 1913. TYPE: New

(holotype, B not seen).

Jahrb. Syst. 50: 132.

Guinea. Schlechter 16375

Hoya patella is an epiphyte with pendent or weakly

twining stems and fleshy leaves from New Guinea.

Inflorescences pedunculate, comprising racemes with

| to 5 flowers; pedicels ca. 50 mm long, glabrous.

Calyx lobes obtuse-triangular, ca. | mm.

^

Corolla campanulate, light pink, externally glabrous, hirsute, internally with reticulate nervature, ca. 3 cm diam.: lobes triangular-ovate, reflexed, ca. 5 X 2 mm, with hairy margins (Fig. 10A). Gynostegium on a shorl

column (Fig. LOA).

corolla.

Corona much smaller than the dark red, smooth; inner processes slightly

ascending (Fig. 10B), shorter than anther appendages (Fig. 10D, E):

margins that do not

processes revolute but with (Fig. 10C. G): appendages lanceolate, acute, exceeding the corona

(Fig. 10D, E);

(Fig. 10D, E, H). Pollinarium comprising 2

ouler

anther

touch

lobes style head shortly apiculate pollinia connected by short, flattened, winged caudicles to

a corpusculum: pollinia longer than wide, cylindrical- elongate, protruding outward at the basal part, ca. 0.7 X 0.3 mm (Fig. I0F): pellucid margin covering the of the pollinia (Fig. 10F); X 0.] mm, with 2 short appendages (Fig. 10F); caudicles ca. 0.1 X 0.03 mm (Fig. 10F).

entire dorsal margin

corpusculum rhomboid, ca. 0.2 ending

9. Hoya retusa Dalzell, Kew J. Bot. 4: 294. 1852. Hoya retusa Warb. Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 3: 344. 1907, nom. illeg. TYPE: Ind. Or.

Dalzell s.n. (holotype, K not seen).

Hoya retusa is an epiphyte with non-twining pendent stems and fleshy foliage from India. Inflor- escences pedunculate, comprising a much-reduced a single flower; pedicels ca. a. 0.33 X

white, ca.

raceme carrying only 10 mm long. Calyx lobes elliptic-oblong, <

0.2 mm. Corolla flattened-campanulate,

15 mm diam.; lobes triangular-acute, pubescent, ca. 5 X 2 mm. Corona outer processes keel-shaped, dark aculely ascending, outer pro- (Fig. 11A-C, E);

appendages lanceolate, acute, noticeably exceeding

red; inner processes

cesses deeply revolute anther

the corona lobes (Fig. 11B, C); style head shortly apiculate (Fig. 11A, D).

pollinia connected by broadly f.

Pollinarium comprising 2

attened, unwinged caudicles to a corpusculum; pollinia oblong-elongate,

ca. 0.4 X 0.2 mm (Fig. 11F); corpusculum ca. 0.3 X

O. Umm (Fig. LIF); caudicles ending with short

).04. X 0.02 mm (Fig. 11F).

appendages, ca. (

10. Hoya venusta Schltr., 1913. TYPE: New (holotype, B not seen).

Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 50: 128.

Guinea. Schlechter 18767

Hoya venusta is an epiphytic climber with fleshy leaves from New Guinea. Inflorescences pedunculate, comprising umbels with 10 to 15 flowers, ca. 1.5 em

diam. Calyx lobes obtuse, 1-2.5 X 0.5 mm, glabrous.

Corolla campanulate, white to dark pink, outside elabrous, internally papillose-hairy; lobes obovate, 5— 7 X 5-6 mm. Gynostegium on a short column

(Fig. 12A). Corona creamy white with light red center, striate; inner processes ascending, covering the style head (Fig. 12B—D), central part of the lobes with an

umbo (Fig. 12B, F); outer processes deeply revolute

Fig. 12E); anther appendages lanceolate-acute, much exceeding the corona lobes (Fig. 12C, D); style head

shortly apiculate (Fig. 12B—D). Pollinarium compris-

ing 2 pollinia connected by broadly flattened, unwinged caudicles to a corpusculum; pollinia

0.4 X 0.2 mm (Fig. 126, H);

rhomboid,

obovoid-oblong, ca.

corpusculum small, size not measured

(Fig. 12G, H); caudicles ca. 0.1 X 0.04 mm (Fig. 12G, H).

DISCUSSION

Omlor (1998) considered the genera Absolmsia, Dischidia,

In his generic revision of the Marsdenieae, Hoya, Madangia, and Micholitzia to form a group (the Hoya-group) characterized by flowers having coronas with revolute outer processes, pollinia with pellucid

margins, and fusiform seeds without prominent wings.

g

Likewise, a close relationship between the genera Hoya, Dischidia, and Micholitzia has been reported in several molecular phylogenetic studies (e.g., Potgieter & Albert, 2001; Livshultz, 2002, 2003; Rapini et al., 2003; Meve & Liede,

studies resolved the phylogenetic

2004). However, none of these relationship. be- tween these genera. In order to explore the boundaries of Hoya, (2006a. b) species of this genus and close relatives of the Ma- dangia, and Micholitzia were found nested within 2006a, b).

Absolmsia

Wanntorp et al. analyzed

Marsdenieae. The monotypic genera Absolmsia, Hoya with strong support (Wanntorp et al.,

Below, we discuss the position of spartioides, Madangia inflata, and Micholitzia obcor- data nested within Hoya by comparing their flower morphology with that of closely related species of

Hoya.

50 Annals of the

Missouri Botanical Garden

i 5h n " JD 1

.

REG > tt um A NS NS

e A Err he

ami

PON

Figure. 10. He oya patella. . Side (A) and above (B, C) views of flowers with corolla (el), corona ia revolute outer processes (op). inner processes (ip), anther appendages (aa), guide rails (gr), pollinia (po), and style head (s part of flower s inner 5 corona proce

). E. Upper (cp). and slyle head (st).

sses, anther appendages (aa), pollinia (po) with pellucid margins es . corpusculum Pollinarium with pollinia (po), corpusculum (cp), and caudicles (ca) art of flower showing ovary (ov outer corona (op) processes. —H. | l 8 D p) I

G. Cross section of lower guide rails (gr), corpuscula (ep), and style head (st). Scale bars

ongitudinal section of flower showing position of

mm (A-C), 1.5 mm (G), 100 um (F, H), 200 um (D, E).

Volume 94, Number 1 Wanntorp Forster 51 2007 Phylogenetic Relationships of Hoya

Fig 11. Hoya retusa. A. Sectioned flower showing inner (ip) and outer (op) revolute corona processes, guide rails (gr), em Reni head (st). —B, C. Corona seen from side (B) and from above (C) showing inner (ip) and outer (op) revolute corona processes, guide rails (gr), and anther appendages (aa). —D. Longitudinal section of upper p of flower with guide rails (gr). corpusculum (ep), and style head (st). —E. Longitudinal section of flower showing calyx (cx), corolla (cl), inner (ip) and outer (op) corona processes, guide rails (gr). style he: d (st). and y (po). —F. Pollinarium with colla i pe elluc ‘id margins (pe). corpusculum (ep), and caudicles (ca). Scale bars = n (A). 3 mm (B), 100 um (D, F), 300 um (C.

THE GENERIC STATUS OF ABSOLMSIA almost entirely found in the section Eriostemma Schltr.

At first sight, mature plants of Absolmsia look Absolmsta spartioides was first described by Ben- very unlike Hoya because they lack the leaves tham in 1880 as Astrostemma spartioides Benth., but characteristic of that genus. Leaves are only present this name was later changed to Absolmsia by Kuntze, in very young plants of Absolmsia; in mature plants, because he regarded it as too similar to the name of photosynthesis is instead carried out mainly by long, another genus of tribe Marsdenieae, Asterostemma green, perennial peduncles of the inflorescences. In Decne. (Omlor, 1998). The similarity between most species of Hoya, the peduncles are also Absolmsia and Hoya was first pointed out by perennial; only a few Hoya species have annual Schlechter (1916: 2), who stated that “Absolmsia,

peduncles, a derived character state in this genus and placed by K. Schumann within Cynanchinae, belongs

52 Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Figure 12. oya venusta. \—D. Details of flowers showing the corona a inner (ip) and outer (op) revolute processes, "sr (em). anther appendages (aa). style head (st). and pollinia (po). —E. F. Coronas seen from side showing guide rails (gr). —G, H. Pollinaria adnate to anther appendage (aa). VV nd caudicles (ea). Scale bars = 1 mm (B). 100 um (C, G, H), 200 um (Dr 300 Um (A, E. F)

Volume 94, Number 1 2007

Wanntorp 4 Forster 53 Phylogenetic Relationships of Hoya

doubts near to Hoya.” Omlor (1998

included Absolmsia in a Hoya-group based on several

without any

morphological characters common to both of these

genera: a corona with inner processes that cover the

anthers and outer revolute processes (Fig. 1D, E):

pollinia with a dorsal pellucid margin (Fig. 2H): and

almost round seeds with thickenings on the lateral

walls of cells in their seed coats. Based on

morphological similarities in the shapes of the corona Kloppenburg reduced Absolmsia to

and corolla,

synonymy under Hoya, transferring the name as H. spartioides (Kloppenburg, 2001) Hoya

indicates that the sister group of Absolmsia spartioides

The available molecular phylogeny for

is H. curtisii and that these two species are part of

a weakly supported clade also including H. lacunosa and a well-supported subclade a 5 imbricata and

H. caudata (Wanntorp et al., 2006b). Absolmsia

e

H. curtisii differ EUR in flower latter pletely reflexed. lobes and a corona lying on an annulus (Fig. 4A,

and a

spartioides anc morphology. the having a corolla with com- B), while Absolmsia has a campan-

ulate corolla corona without any annular structure (Fig. LA, €). Because the sample of Hoya species included in the molecular studies of Wanntorp

et al. (2006a, b)

species of Hoya, it is probable that the retrieved sister

was limited to only 35 out of over 300

relationship between A. spartioides and H. curtisii will change by the inclusion of additional species of Hoya in the molecular phylogeny. Although it is not possible at this stage to point to a particular species of Hoya as sister to Absolmsia, the inclusion of this genus in Hoya was nevertheless clearly shown in the (2006a, b) concordance with previous morphological

(Omlor, 1998; Kloppenburg, 2001).

The shape of the corolla varies extensively in Hoya

and is i

tree of Wanntorp et al.

studies

from rotate with revolute lobes (e.g.. H. lacunosa, Fig. 7A), (Fig. Kloppenb. 1996).

in M. curtisii. Corolla characters (especially the shape)

flattened-campanulate in H. caudata 3A), or urceolate to globose in H. heuschkeliana

and H. Omlor (Omlor,

The corolla lobes are commonly reflexed

telosmoides R.

Hoya seem highly labile and have undoubtedly

evolved numerous times. The shape of the corona, on

the other hand, seems to be a

phylogenetic value for linking Absolmsta to Hoya, as both have coronas with deeply revolute outer pro- 1998; Fig. 1D, E). In

eynostegium of Absolmsia, as in many Hoya, 1s

a column that varies in the degree of indument and in

cesses to the lobes (Omlor, addition, the species of raised above the corolla on conspicuousness. This column is short in Absolmsia (Fig. IC). H. patella (Vig. LOA), anc

(Fig. 3B) and not as conspicuous as in H. curtisii

H. caudata

character of higher

(Fig. 4D). Pollinia of Absolmsta, Hoya, Micholitzia, and Madangia have a pellucid dorsal margin in which pollen tubes germinate (Omlor, 1998: this study). This trait is unknown in the genus Dischidia (Meve, 2001) and all other species of the Marsdenieae (Omlor, 1998). These

molecular results (Wanntorp et al., 2006a. b) support

morphological characters and the

the inclusion of Absolmsia in Hoya, transferred. by Kloppenburg (2001) as H. spartioides (Benth.) Klop-

penb.

THE GENERIC STATUS OF VADANGIA

Forster et al. (1997) collected a plant in the Madang province of New Guinea that very much resembled species of Hoya in its epiphytic habit and. fleshy

leaves. The plant was assigned to the monotypic genus

Madangia on the basis of floral morphological characters unique for this species. One of these

characters was the elobose shape of the corolla, which

is unusual Hoya as discussed by Forster et al. (1997

species with similar corolla shape. Omlor (1996) also

. who mentioned H. heuschkeliana as the only

mentioned a species from Sabah, H. telosmoides, with

a similar corolla shape, although this species has

^

corollas internally covered. with long recurved hairs. Madangia inflata is well supported as sister species to the New Guinean H. hypolasia, both being part of a larger clade, including other species from Australia H. patella, H. venusta, and ex J. Traill and A. Wanntorp et al., 2006a, b).

associ-

and New Guinea (e.g., a subelade with H. australis R. Br. albiflora Zipp. ex Blume) on the other

Hoya heuschkeliana, hand, was ated with species from the Acanthostemma Blume group, Which have pubescent corollas and completely reflexed lobes that give the flowers a globular shape. Hoya telosmoides was not found close to M. inflata in 2006b).

the corolla in Hoya and

the tree (Wanntorp et al., These results again support the plasticity of underline the hazard of establishing too much reliance upon single corolla characters in the recognition of genera in the group.

The corona of Madangia inflata has a remarkable shape, which contributed to the decision of Forster et

al. (1997) to establish a new genus for this species.

-

The five inner corona processes are free at the apical part near the style head as in Hoya, but their outer parts, corresponding to the outer processes of the corona lobes in Hoya, form a continuous rim that is folded inward (Fig. 8D). which has not been previously discussed, is found in

A similar corona shape,

H. lacunosa (Vig. 7B). In this species also, the five

outer corona lobes are fused at their basal part,

forming a skirt that somewhat resembles the membra- Madangia (Fig. 8D).

nous corona of According to

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Wanntorp et al. (2006b). H. lacunosa, however, Hoya

separated from M. inflata. Vhis corona tvpe there

groups

with many other species of and is clearly

ore seems to have arisen independently several times in Hoya, paralleling the variation in corolla morphology.

The remaining flower parts of Madangia are very similar to Hoya. The column between the corolla and the gynostegium is very conspicuous in Madangía as Hoya, such as H. curtisii. H. venusta (Figs. 4D, 7G, 12A). The D) have a clear 6G). Another

interesting character not previously noted in Madan-

species of and H.

Madangia (Fig. 2C.

in many lacunosa, pollinia of pellucid margin as in Hoya (e.g... Fig. gia 1s the dimerous style head that is flat and shortly both and H. (Figs. 8B, OC) and shortly apiculate-conical in

macgillivrayt V. Bailey, H. venusta (Fig. 12€, D). and H. patella (Fig. 10D) of the same clade. The

shape of the style head and the morphology. of the

apiculate i Madangia hypolasia

pollinaria are in agreement with the molecular results (2006b). that

Madangia should be included in Hoya as H. inflata.

of Wanntorp et al. and we propose

THE GENERIC STATUS OF VICHOLITZIA

During an expedition to India and Burma, the

orchid collector W. Micholitz discovered a new taxon,

later described as Micholitzia obcordata (Brown, 1909). Micholitzia was again collected China by

Handel-Mazzetti and respectively, H.

in India by Deb and named, Hand.-Mazz. and H.

Tsiang and Li collected

yuennanensis manipurensis Deb. In 1974, the same plant in China, thought it to be a new species of Hoya that they called H. lantsangensis Tsiang & P. T. Li. and erected a new section Antiostelma for i

0 . rred 1 9 ia to Dischidia 17

and P. i (1992: 218) argued that the cylindric shape É ^n corollas and the bud aestivation, which “twisted leftward.” were different enough from those of Hoya and Dischidia,

rotate and urceolate corollas, respectively, to

with valvate aestivation and ralse section Antiostelma in Hoya to generic rank. Accord- i 2006a),

nested within Hoya, even though its

ing to molecular evidence (Wanntorp et al., Micholitzia is sister relationship to any of the species of Hoya is less Absol- : Madangia. In these Micholitzia Absolmsia, adventitious roots are produced at the leaf nodes (Goyder & Kent, 1994). The corolla of Micho-

litzia is of a similar urceolate or tubular shape to that

Micholitzia is more similar to Dischidia. ot

but not in

clear. In habit, msia than to Hoya. last three genera, and

of a few species of Hoya (e.g., H. heuschkeliana) but is wider at the lower part of the corollas (Goyder & Kent, 1994).

many species of Dischidia, but in this genus usually

This shape superficially resembles that of

only the upper internal part of the corolla is

pubescent. while in Micholitzia the corollas are uniformly pubescent on the outside and inside (Goyder & Kent, 1994). The corona of Micholitzia has been considered to be different from that of

Dischidia and Hoya because its five fleshy and almost round lobes do not end as in Hoya with five pointed inner processes on the anther appendages. lts inner corona processes are instead blunt-ended and appear almost as if they. were united to the five conspicuous anther appendages hiding the flat and short style head. Despite the different inner corona processes of

Micholitzia, the outer processes of the corona lobes

have revolute margins (Fig. 9C) similar to those of Hoya (e. g., H. retusa) (Omlor, 1998: Fig. 11B). In addition, the pollinaria of Micholitzia have clear

; Fig. 9F). Clear pellu- 2H),

5E) but are

pellucid margins (Omlor, 1998 cid margins are also present in Absolmsia (Fig. Madangia (Vig. 2C), and Hova (e.g.. Fig. Dischidia.

margin of Micholitzia, however, is superficially differ-

absent in The position of the pellucid

ent from Hoya because it is apparently situated at the

ower part of the pollinia instead of at the outer edge 1994),

this is due to the twisting of the pollinia of Micholitzia.

(Fig. OF), but as observed by Goyder and Kent By rotating the pollinia at 90 , the pellucid margin takes the same position as in the pollinia of Hoya. Based on the molecular evidence for Hoya and on the the outer

similarity of the pollinia and of corona

processes, Micholitzia should be included in a broadly defined Hoya. Due to the prior use of the epithet obcordata in Hoya, inclusion of Micholitzia obcordata in Hoya necessitates a change of epithet for the spe- cies, based on the next available name of the several synonymous species, which is H. yuennanensis.

CONCLUSION

A recurring theme in recent molecular-based

phylogenies within the Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoideae

is that morphological classifications based on single,

pe

albeit unusual, floral features (especially of the corolla or coronas) are not corroborated by molecular data (e. g.

Meve & Liede, 2001, 2002, 2004).

the molecular phylogeny to date (Wanntorp et al..

In the Hoya group,

2006b) indicates relationships that follow geographical

patterns, as shown by the clade including almost

exclusively Australian and New Guinean species, but

also partly reflect morphological similarity, as in

Madangia, Absolmsia, and Micholitzia.

Literature Cited Bentham, G. 1868. Asclepiadaceae. Pp. 324-348 in G. Bentham & F. Mueller (editors), Flora Australiensis, Vol.

4. Lovell Reeve & Co.,

London.

Volume 94, Number 1 2007

Wanntorp & Forster 55 Phylogenetic Relationships of Hoya

Brown, N. E. 1909. c oen N. E. Br. Bull. Misc. Kew 1909: 358- 3

Deb, D. B. 11 new aos ies of Hoya from Manipur. J. Indian Bot. En 34:

Endress. M. E. & ^ Bruyns. 2000. A revised loe cation of the Apocynaceae s.l. Bot. Rev. 66: 1-56. & W.D 2001. renaissance of the

| Stevens. 2001. The | 1

Apocynaceae s.l: Recent adva systematic

phylogeny, and evolution: SCC don Missouri Bot. Gard. 88: 517—522.

Forster, P. I. 1995. Circumscription of Marsdenia (Asclepia- daceae: Marsdenieae), with a revision of the genus in Australia and Papuasia. Austral. Syst. Bot. 8: 703-933,

& D. J. Liddle. 1996. Hoya. Pp. 231-237 in A. E. Orchard (editor). Australia 28. CSIRO. Mel- bou

Flora of

I. M. Liddle. : Mar in

1 5 Papua New FEN

1997. neae) a new genus and species

Wadangia inflata se le pladaceae Vustrobaileya 5: 53—57. —— ———. 1998. Diversity. in the. genus RM ( Ascle "i eae Marsden snieae). Aloe 35: 44-48 ———,.——— & ————. . The genus Hoya R. Br. TE TER Marsdenie " as commonly cultivated in

Australia. Asklepios 78: 18—

——— & ——— . Dischidia, pladaceae). Pp. 90-103 7 neer (edito tural Flora 5 oalr eastern Australia, Vol. . a South W i "ss, Sydney.

Gilbert, M. G. E^ D.S Stevens & P.-T. Li. Ascle proosa ‘eae of China. Novon 5: 1-16.

Goyder, D. J. D. H. Kent. 1994. Micholitzia obcordata N. E. Br. : (Asc i spiadaceae, Marsdenieae) reinstated. Askle-

5 ( Ascle- + Hortic ul- . New

1995. Notes on the

pios 62: 13-20. 1990. New

Holmgren, P. K . Holmgren & Barnett. Th

L. C. > Herbaria of the World.

Index odia New York Achocki. 1996.

York Botanical uw K 0 / microtome sec som of pre historic chi

Igersheim, A. 4 A simple method for

y methacrylate (HE

. Palynol. 92: : 39€

Donkelaar. 2001. and ecology of the genus Hoya (Asclepiadaceae) in Central Sulawesi. Blumea 46: 457-483.

s D. 2001. ( Ch. ange of genus. Fraterna 14: 8-10.

Li, P.-T.

from C Tie

rareoal specimens, (HEMA

Kleijn, D. & R. van Notes on the taxonomy

. Antiostelma (Asclepiadaceae), a new genus Novo 2: 218-219

Liede, S. F. Albers. 1994. Ear f ida ol Asclepia o genera. on 43: 201-2

Livshultz, T. 2002. Systematics and 1 5 aa le saves in t genus Dischidia (Asclepiadaceae). annual

meeting, Portland, Oregon, iR 2000. ae No. 94.

Inform.

2003. Lec totypific ation of Dolichostegia Schlechter se Je spiadoideae, Apocynaceae) and a new combination, 95—000.

. Botanical notes on the vascular flora of

Thailand: 2. Nat. Hist. Bull.

(A Dischidia Ms Taxon 52: 5 Maxwell, J. F. Chiang Mai 1 ince, Soc. 39: 71-8: Meve, U.

20 Balusan (Philippines,

Siam

Mt.

. and remarks on m ie urceolate

83 01. Hoy heuschkeliana. a neo-endemic Luzon) flower a in Ascle M ae. Asklepios 82: 7-10. Pa 2001. une in /

Inclusion of. Ten aris and rachystelma (Apocynaceae—Asclepia- nferred from

doideae—Ceropegieae non-coding nuc le "ur and chloroplast | NA.